In the Wheel of Time, according to the First Oath, an Aes Sedai can 'speak no word that is not true'. So what can she say (Foretellings aside) about that notoriously unpredictable realm, the future? (The same question could apply to statements made in the ancient language in Paolini's Inheritance series, if people know that but not WoT.)

If she says, "This will happen", does it mean she has to be certain it will happen, or just that she thinks it will happen, or hopes it will, or thinks it more than 50% likely it will?

Can she say, "We'll be fine" if: a) it's very unlikely, but she's kidded herself into believing it? b) she recognises it's very unlikely, and doesn't believe it, but wants to reassure someone else?

Is there any difference between 'shall' and 'will' in what she can say, i.e. in whether the choice of words implies the speaker's volition? E.g. maybe she can say "You shall do this" meaning "I command you to do this" but not "You will do this" as a statement about the future?

Admittedly this is really more of a philosophical question about truth than an SFF question, but there could be an answer to this in maybe an interview with RJ. And for all you duplicate-question-closers out there, I've looked at this question and although the top answer there does discuss Aes Sedai statements about the future, it's only in the context of statements about what the speaker herself will do, and doesn't answer any of my specific questions above.

  • If the answers to that question do not answer this question, please explain how and why - because it looks very much like they do. It would be better, instead of saying "these answers don't answer my question" to say "Related to this question, except X and Y" where x and y are your reasions this question is different and will produce different answers.
    – Zibbobz
    Commented Sep 10, 2014 at 18:58
  • @Zibbobz - Re your edit, I always put 'Thanks in advance' at the bottom of stackexchange questions. No-one's taken issue with it before. As requested I've now clarified the differences between my question and the other one.
    – Rand al'Thor
    Commented Sep 10, 2014 at 19:07

3 Answers 3


The Three Oaths allowed you to say whatever you believed was true even if you could not prove it, as well as to dodge around truth; only words you knew to be a lie would not come off your tongue.

"New Spring" (short story), collected in Legends

Here, the extents of the Three Oaths are stated clearly. Aes Sedai cannot knowingly lie.

Asmodean later criticises this.

"[...] What Moiraine believes to be truth, she tells as truth whether or not it is; one of a thousand weaknesses in those fool Oaths."

The Fires Of Heaven, chapter 3, "Pale Shadows"

The Three Oaths allow an Aes Sedai to say something she believes to be true even if she cannot prove it. She can't knowingly lie.
In other words — and this is my interpretation — if she knows something will be absolutely false, she cannot say it.

So she can say, "we'll be fine" if she has deluded herself the they will be, but she can't say the same by way of reassurance if she knows that they're paddle-less up a river of excrement.

  • 1
    So they can say "X is true", but not "I know X is true", provided they don't know X is false?
    – Rand al'Thor
    Commented Sep 11, 2014 at 14:30
  • What about if she neither believes herself that they'll be fine, nor knows that they're not fine, but simply isn't sure? Can she say "We'll be fine" if a true pedant would say "I don't know if we'll be fine or not", or can she only say e.g. "We may be fine" or "I hope we'll be fine"?
    – Rand al'Thor
    Commented Jul 21, 2017 at 9:10
  • 1
    @Randal'Thor from my reading it seems that sortnof thing is exactly why they don't ever speak in direct answers, even if they are certain. You're far more likely to get a "the wheel weaves as the wheel wills" out of them than any direct reassurance.
    – Paul
    Commented Jul 21, 2017 at 10:48
  • @Randal'Thor is there a way to make my answer acceptable to you?
    – SQB
    Commented Mar 17, 2022 at 8:48
  • @SQB I've been holding out on acceptance for this (very old) question in the hope of someone actually doing an exhaustive analysis of statements made by Aes Sedai anywhere in the books, rather than just relying on the theory of the first oath. I realise that's a lot to ask for, though, so I haven't explicitly demanded it in the question. Might need to think about it a bit more and see if I want to accept one of the existing answers after all.
    – Rand al'Thor
    Commented Mar 24, 2022 at 9:41

Their constraints seem to be simply that they cannot knowingly lie. For example, they cannot say their dress is blue if it is red. Now pertaining to a future statement, they would not be able to say "I guarantee you that tomorrow you will not die". They could however say "I believe that tomorrow you will not die". We see throughout the books that when talking about the future they usually hedge their statements; Moiraine does this a lot, saying things like 'I believe' or 'should'. We never see them speaking absolutes about the future, as they would be restricted on that, except in the case of prophecy. One example is Rand talking about how he will die, because the prophecy says that he will have his blood spilled at Shayol Ghul. Moiraine says something to the effect of "you may not necessarily have to die", but she never says "you don't have to die" or "you won't die". She gives a very speculative answer based on possibility without a lie.

Basically they will not be allowed to say absolutes about the future, and I'm pretty sure they never do. But that is 14 books' worth of combing every line to prove myself wrong, so I'll believe my truths :D


By the end of the series, it is well established that the First Oath only applies to the speaker's perception of their words. If they think what they say is not "not true", then it is okay.

  • 1
    Canon backup please? Also, does your double negative mean they can say anything they don't know to be false, even if it's unlikely, or just anything they believe?
    – Rand al'Thor
    Commented Sep 10, 2014 at 19:16
  • I don't have the books on hand, but in this blog post, Jordan said the oath is enforced by "intent and result", and that only perceived untruths are forbidden. The Wikipedia article has a list of places where loopholes are mentioned, but I can't search the books to do better than a chapter reference.
    – Ryan Reich
    Commented Sep 11, 2014 at 0:38
  • Look at what Elaida said about how Rand Al'Thor and Egwene would react after she became the Amyrlin.
    – DougM
    Commented Dec 19, 2014 at 0:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.