Reading this question, a thought visited me:
Sirius Black was disliked by his family (Blacks) because he didn't follow their blood purity ideology and was friends with Potter, Lupin, and co.
'I used to be there,' said Sirius, pointing at a small, round, charred hole in the tapestry, rather like a cigarette burn. 'My sweet old mother blasted me off after I ran away from home ...
...
'But . . . why did you . . . ?'
'Leave?' Sirius smiled bitterly and ran his fingers through his long, unkempt hair. 'Because I hated the whole lot of them: my parents, with their pure-blood mania, convinced that to be a Black made you practically royal . . . my idiot brother, soft enough to believe them . . . that's him.'
... 'He {{Regulus}} was younger than me,' said Sirius, 'and a much better son, as I was constantly reminded.'
... " . . . he joined the Death Eaters.'... 'Come on, Harry, haven't you seen enough of this house to tell what kind of wizards my family were?' said Sirius testily.
'Were were your parents Death Eaters as well?'
'No, no, but believe me, they thought Voldemort had the right idea, they were all for the purification of the wizarding race, getting rid of Muggle-borns and having pure-bloods in charge. They weren't alone, either, there were quite a few people, before Voldemort showed his true colours, who thought he had the right idea about things . . . they got cold feet when they saw what he was prepared to do to get power, though. But I bet my parents thought Regulus was a right little hero for joining up at first.'
But, as far as the entire world (his family included) knew, on the night of Potters' deaths, Sirius showed that he was a Death Eater and betrayed Potters and murdered 13 Muggles.
Given that dramatic (seeming) 180 degree turn, is there any canon evidence that his family:
Joined the rest of the Wizarding world in believing the latter
If so, changed their opinion of him (even if his face didn't get re-attached to the family tree tapestry).