Is there a recommended order of watching Dr. Who for someone familiar with the show's idea and main points (e.g. someone who read tons of DW Q&As on SFF.SE :) but never watched before?

E.g. should they be watched in Chronological order? Or release order? Or most recent series first?

A specific caveat is that there's already an assumption that the show will be liked and 100% of all seasons watched, therefore the main concern is not so much seeing the "best for a newbie to get hooked content" (as in here: " https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/2585/what-episodes-of-doctor-who-should-i-watch-first") but more of the following factors:

  • what is the best approach to continuity (an episode E1 that helps understand something in episode E2 should be watched in E1=>E2 order)
  • the least amount of spoilers (ala "I don't want to find out SW:ESB's major twist before watching the prequels")
  • extra weight given to the order recommended specifically by creative team(s) associated with the show.
  • 7
    "Continuity" is a bit of a misnomer in Doctor Who; episodes frequently contradict established canon. Personally I don't think the order matters all that much at all, except for the Key to Time arc in season 16 Commented Dec 20, 2014 at 0:37
  • 13
    Is it even possible to watch the entire show? Last I heard there were a bunch of early episodes that were unavailable in any form. Commented Dec 20, 2014 at 2:16
  • 8
    @AlanShutko There are ~98 episodes still unaccounted for in video form, mostly from Patrick Troughton's run (1966-1969), but the audio has survived on all of them. Some of them have been animated by fans, and all of them survive in the form of "reconstructions", where the "video" is a slideshow of official telesnaps (high-quality) and photographs/crude recordings of home TVs (poor quality). So it's possible to watch them, though it's not quite the same experience Commented Dec 20, 2014 at 3:18
  • 15
    Start at the beginning, and continue until you reach the end; then stop. Commented Feb 10, 2015 at 23:10
  • 12
    Personally, I would love to see someone figure out how to watch Doctor Who in chronological order :)
    – KutuluMike
    Commented Feb 11, 2015 at 0:06

3 Answers 3


At the outset, it's important to remember that Doctor Who is not, in general, beholden to its own continuity. Any episode can, and frequently does, change virtually any statement made in a previous episode1. So take any notion of continuity you may have with a TARDIS-sized grain of salt.

Personally I advise watching in release order, because you'll experience the evolution of the show from "educational children's serial" to "cornerstone of British popular culture". That's what I did when I first got into Doctor Who, and I wouldn't have had it any other way.

It's also common to recommend watching the newer stuff before older stuff, whether older means pre-1966 or pre-1989 or something else entirely. There's generally logic to this, as the series has (as a general trend) gotten more reliably watchable2 as the years went on. And of course every fan has their personal favourite "hook" episodes - "Blink" and "City of Death" are some of the more common ones to hold this honour.

Ultimately, if you're going to watch the whole 800+ episode run either way, it doesn't really matter. Pick your favourite eras and start with those.

However, there are some things to keep in mind, which I'll try to go through in more-or-less decreasing order of importance.

Episodes vs. Stories

You have to remember that the classic Doctor Who was scripted, filmed, and broadcast in a serialized format, with weekly episodes that comprised parts of larger plots. For this reason, it's common to use the term "episode" to refer to a single airing of the show, and "story" to refer to the multi-week arcs.

The length of each story varied, although after the transition to colour in 1967 they were general consistent within a season3. Aside from one one-off (which was actually a prequel to a later story), they ranged from two episodes long up to a memorable twelve-part epic, with most at either three or four episodes.

Watch the episodes in any given story in broadcast order. That's how they were written, that's how the narrative unfolds, and that's how they should be consumed. There's a solid case to be made to watch each episode a week apart, since that's how the show was originally broadcast; while it would certainly improve the pacing of some of the weaker stories, that may take a prohibitively long time to do4.

Season-long arcs

In the new series, this sort of thing is represented by the "arc words" that typically characterize series3 - "Bad Wolf" in series 1, "Silence will fall" in series 5, etc. These aren't really arcs, but rather a loose grouping of episodes under a common theme. You can watch these in any order.

A similar thing occurs in season 8, where the character of The Master was introduced and appeared in every story of that season. In general the stories don't rely on each other, so you can also watch these in any order.

There are two other season-long arcs in Doctor Who: The Key to Time arc of season 16, and The Trial of a Time Lord arc of season 23. Each story in these arcs really do build to a larger point, so these stories should be watched in order.

Sort of tangentially related to this premise is season 12, the Fourth Doctor's first season. While not actually an "arc", per se, the episodes are pieces of the larger story of the Doctor and his companions trying to get back to Earth. It's not essential that you watch them in order, but it also doesn't hurt to.

Similarly, series 1 and 2 had a recurring subplot in the form of Rose Tyler's family back in England, a weird genre mashup between Doctor Who and British soaps that the TARDIS Eruditorium called EastPowellStreet. In typical soap opera style, the characters of EastPowellStreet (mainly Rose's parents Pete and Jackie, and her (ex-)boyfriend Mickey) have a kind of character arc that weaves through the Doctor Who story they get thrown into. Whether you want to watch this arc in order depends on how invested you are in the EastPowellStreet characters, really.

Another sort-of arc, in the new series this time, is the "The X of the Doctor" trilogy (quadrilogy, if you count the short "The Night of the Doctor"), "The Name of the Doctor", "The Day of the Doctor", and "The Time of the Doctor". This trilogy has a very definite character arc for the Eleventh Doctor, but plot-wise it's not essential that you watch in order.

Two- and three-parters

Distinct from the notion of stories are their last remnant in the revived series: the two-parter. Two-part episodes have been an occasional mainstay of the show since its revival in 2005, most often in series finales:

These should be watched in broadcast order.

There are also two three-part arcs in the revived series:

There are also two three-story arcs in the classic series:

  • Season 18's E-Space trilogy ("Full Circle", "State of Decay", and "Warrior's Gate") form a narrative of the Doctor and Romana getting stuck in E-Space (negative spatial coordinates), and then trying to get back out. This trilogy also serves as the introduction of Adric as a companion, and Romana and K-9's departures
  • Season 20's Black Guardian Trilogy. This trio of stories ("Mawdryn Undead", "Terminus", and "Enlightenment") are linked by newly-minted companion Turlough, who struggles with whether or not to betray the Doctor to advance his own interests.

Each of these arcs should be watched in broadcast order, because they form a single narrative.

The River Song Arc

River Song gets her own subheading, because she is a very odd case. Each of her occasional episodes is part of a larger romantic subplot between her and the Doctor, but the trick is that River is also a time traveller so the relationship is developed out-of-order. If you want to watch the development from the Doctor's point of view, then watch in broadcast order. If you want to watch it from River's point of view, the order is very different, and covered admirably by billpg's answer to another question.

Spoilers/Plot-relevant References

There are occasionally episodes that answer questions posted in previous episodes (or stories, as the case may be), or have otherwise-significant ties to previous episodes. It's generally pretty rare, especially in the classic series, but I'll try and keep a quasi-complete listing below:

  1. Series 2 episode 3, "School Reunion", features the return of Sarah Jane Smith and K-9, companions last seen around season 15. Although you won't have trouble understanding the plot if you're not familiar with them, the emotional beats of the episode will fall flat.

  2. Watch series 2 before series 3. A huge subplot of series 3 doesn't make any sense until you've seen "Doomsday", the series 2 finale.

    Rose Tyler, companion for series 1 and 2, and a major love interest for the Doctor, gets trapped in a parallel universe.

  3. "The Web of Fear" (fifth story of season 5), is a direct sequel to the earlier story "The Abominable Snowmen", the second story of season 2. They should be watched in that order.

  4. Similarly, series 6 episode 12 "Closing Time" is a sequel to series 5 episode 11 "The Lodger". The fact that it's a sequel isn't terribly important to the plot, but the story does assume you're more-or-less familiar with the characters.

  5. One more, series 1 episode 11 "Boom Town" is a sort-of sequel to the earlier two-parter "Aliens of London"/"World War 3". Again, the story assumes you're familiar with a character and the events of those episodes.

  6. "The Angels Take Manhattan" and "The Snowmen", respectively the fifth episode of series 7 and the 2012 Christmas special. Those should absolutely be watched in that order, because, as above, the Doctor's motivations and behaviour change radically in "The Snowmen", for reasons that are part of the climax of "The Angels Take Manhattan".

    The reason is that Amy and Rory, companions for the entire Matt Smith run up to that point, are traumatically lost to him

  7. The tenth anniversary story "The Three Doctors" is a prequel to the first story of season 20 "Arc of Infinity". The later story continues the story of the main villain from "The Three Doctors", though I don't recall if they make any specific references.

  8. The Black Guardian Trilogy (mentioned above) is a sequel to the earlier Key to Time arc (also mentioned above), and should be watched in that order. I don't recall if there are spoilers, but it gives the villain understandable motivations.

  9. Watch "Earthshock" (story 6 of season 19) before "Time-Flight". The opening of the latter episode relies heavily on the ending of the former.

    At the end of "Earthshock", companion Adric dies dramatically. The opening of "Time-Flight" has the remaining companions coming to terms with this.

  10. In series 5 episode 12 "The Pandorica Opens", a major-ish plot point is the return of a character last seen in series 5 episode 9 "Cold Blood". The circumstances of the character's last appearance mean you should probably watch "Cold Blood" first.

    The character is Rory Williams, who had been killed and then erased from time at the end of "Cold Blood." His appearance in "The Pandorica Opens" is a major clue about the situation facing the Doctor and Amy in that episode.

  11. I advise against watching any episode featuring River Song that was broadcast after "A Good Man Goes to War" (series 6, episode 7) unless you've first seen that episode. It reveals a major secret about River's character that, while not essential to understanding her later appearances, is frequently referenced.

    The secret is that River is Amy and Rory's adult daughter, and that she has a certain amount of Time Lord DNA that gives her the ability to regenerate and fly the TARDIS.

  12. Don't watch the 2015 Christmas special ("Last Christmas") before you've seen the series 8 two-part finale "Dark Water"/"Death in Heaven". Occasionally referenced in "Last Christmas" is a major plot point of "Dark Water"/"Death in Heaven":

    The death of Danny Pink, companion Clara Oswald's boyfriend/love interest

  13. Season 20, episode 2 "Snakedance" (a Fifth Doctor story) is a direct sequel to the season 19 episode "Kinda" (pronounced kin-da, not kine-a). Aside from featuring the return of a monster (not unusual for Who), the plot of "Snakedance" follows directly from events in "Kinda". It could be confusing if you don't know what happened.

    What happened in "Kinda" was that Tegan, the Doctor's companion, was possessed by a snake-demon called the Mara. While it ultimately gets banished, it returns in "Snakedance" and attempts to reassert itself in Tegan's mind.

Multi-Doctor Stories

Occasionally, typically for special occasions, the show airs an episode that features a previously-departed Doctor (and usually some companions from that era). You won't get as much out of these stories if you don't have a familiarity with all the guest stars.

  • "The Three Doctors". Doctor Who's tenth anniversary special features the Second Doctor as a guest star, with a brief cameo by the First Doctor. The star of the show is, of course, the Third Doctor.
  • "The Five Doctors". This was the show's twentieth anniversary, and featured a plethora of returning faces alongside the current Fifth Doctor and companions:
    • The First Doctor (played by Richard Hurndall, as William Hartnell had died some years earlier) and Susan Foreman
    • The Second Doctor, with cameos by Jamie McCrimmon and Zoe Heriot
    • The Third Doctor, Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart, Sarah Jane Smith, and cameos by K-9, Mike Yates, and Liz Shaw
    • The Fourth Doctor and Romana have a cameo appearance through file footage (taken from an unaired episode), as Tom Baker declined the offer to return
  • "The Two Doctors". Not an anniversary for once, this episode features the return of the Second Doctor and Jamie McCrimmon alongside the current stars, the Sixth Doctor and Peri Brown.
  • "Dimensions in Time". A Children in Need charity special released for the show's 30th anniversary5, "Dimensions in Time" features the most returning stars of any Doctor Who television piece (I can't speak to the novels):
    • The First and Second Doctors appear in still images. First Doctor companion Susan Foreman and Second Doctor companion Victoria Watterfield both appear
    • The Third Doctor, Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart, Mike Yates, Liz Shaw, and Sarah Jane Smith
    • The Fourth Doctor, K-9, Leela, and Romana II (Lalla Ward)
    • The Fifth Doctor and Nyssa
    • The Sixth Doctor, Peri Brown, and Mel Bush
    • The Seventh Doctor and Ace

    "Dimensions in Time" was also a crossover with the British soap EastEnders. Characters from that show play important roles, but going over them is beyond the scope of this question.

    Although not generally considered canon, I'm including it both for completeness and because it was the 30th anniversary special.

  • "Time Crash" Another Children in Need charity special, released in 2007, "Time Crash" features the Fifth Doctor. The Tenth Doctor is the star of the show.
  • "The Name of the Doctor". The series 7 finale and lead-in to the 50th anniversary special, this episode features all of the previous Doctors (along with the Eleventh Doctor) appearing in some form through judicious use of archive footage. Since they play no significant role in the story proper, it's less critical that you be familiar with them
  • "The Day of the Doctor". The 50th anniversary special featured the Eleventh Doctor alongside the returning Tenth Doctor. The other Nine Doctors appear in cameos thanks to the magic of archive footage.
  • "Deep Breath". The recently-departed Eleventh Doctor makes a brief cameo at the end of this episode.

The Brigadier

A special case to the above, Brigadier Sir Alistair Gordon Lethbridge-Stewart is the longest-running guest star on the show, appearing alongside every Doctor in the classic series at one point or another. Although less important in his earliest appearances, his status as a long-time acquaintance of the Doctor gets played up more and more as the series ages. The Brig's daughter, Kate Lethbridge-Stewart, has recently taken up the torch with her acquaintance with both the Eleventh and Twelfth Doctors.


Obviously the Doctor has had many travelling companions over the years, and they tend to come and go at irregular intervals. If you're watching the show out of order, it may be confusing for you to see companions pop in and out of existence like exotic particles. It's much less important than other things I've mentioned, but if you want to keep consistency with Companions you can find everything you need on Wikipedia.

On occasion, a companion will return after their formal departure. This never happened in the classic era to my recollection, but has happened a handful of times in the revived series (not counting cameos, of which there are several more in both eras):

Although not strictly necessary, it's useful to be familiar with these companions before watching any guest appearances (or the reverse, in Donna's case).

Doctor departures

Similar to the above (although less critical in my opinion) is the fact that, obviously, the Doctor himself changes from time to time. Although this is largely not a problem if you're watching the show out of order, the personality switches can be a bit jarring if you're switching between dramatically different eras - you could go from Chris Eccleston being elated that "everybody lives" in "The Doctor Dances" to William Hartnell about to brain a caveman with a rock in "100,000 B.C." (part 2 of "An Unearthly Child"). If you want to maintain that sort of consistency, you may find it useful to bear in mind the span of episodes in which each Doctor appears. The Wikipedia article on Regeneration has a decent list of regeneration episodes, which should help inform your viewing.


This is the most common thing you miss by not watching in broadcast order.

One of the inevitabilities of being such a long-running, popular show is that eventually you'll be run by people who grew up as fans of the show. The early seasons of John Nathan-Turner's run as lead producer (seasons 19-22)6 is one such time, but it's become most noticeable in the revived series7. Writers in these eras in particular are fond of including sly, blink-and-you-miss it references to past episodes. These references are generally not required to understand the episode you're watching.

A perfect example occurs in series 5, episode 6 "The Vampires of Venice", an Eleventh Doctor story. At one point in the episode, the Doctor mistakenly pulls out an old library card featuring the First Doctor's face:

The Two Doctors

These jokes are meant to reward long-time viewers of the series, so it's not critical that you understand the reference.

I have no doubt that this is far from an exhaustive list (and I'm sure the commenters will converge soon pointing out various omissions), but as a general note I want to point out that Wikipedia has a remarkably detailed entry for every episode (or story) of Doctor Who, ~99% of which include a "Continuity" section. This section details most (though not necessarily all) of the back-references in the given episode/story, from the trivial name-dropping to more significant plot points. This is a very good resource for doing research on an episode-by-episode basis.

1 To the point where the show has provided two incompatible alien origins for the Loch Ness Monster, three different accounts of the sinking of Atlantis, hilariously convoluted histories for both the Daleks and Cybermen, and several truly cosmic retcons for the Doctor himself.

2 With a generally-agree-upon rough patch around series 20-24

3 I'll be using "series" to refer to post-2005 seasons, and "season" to refer to 1963-1989 seasons.

4 Classic-series episodes were typically 25 minutes each, although in season 22 they were upped to 45 minutes (though fewer were commissioned - it was a rough time for the show), and the classic series had 696 of them. That's a lot of weeks.

5 The special was released in 1993, four years after Doctor Who was officially cancelled. This makes it the first live-action Doctor Who of the Wilderness Years

6 This era is notable because Nathan-Turner retained the services of Ian Levine as a sort of unofficial "continuity advisor" for the show. A vocal superfan, Levine was one of the loudest voices for an increased engagement with the show's past. Whether or not this was ultimately a good thing is a matter of some debate

7 Many writers of post-2005 episodes, notably Mark Gatiss, Paul Cornell, and Russell T. Davies himself, all contributed to the line of Doctor Who novels published by Target Books between 1986 and 1997. Steven Moffat was also fairly well-known on Doctor Who newsgroups (Wikipedia link for younger readers who never heard of them), where (among other things) he initially put forth the theory that the Doctor inspires people to add the word "doctor" to their languages.

  • 10
    What an answer. And I don't even Dr. Who. Commented Feb 11, 2015 at 18:26
  • 3
    @PartyKingThrandeezy If you ever decide to, now you know where to start Commented Feb 13, 2015 at 3:19
  • 4
    Incidentally, I've very nearly hit the character limit for answers. That's cool, never done that before Commented Oct 31, 2015 at 22:49
  • 3
    This answer is way too long. Thoroughness is great, but at some point it must take a back seat to readability. Basically, your answer says if you can sit through the kookiness of the earlier episodes, watch them in chronological/broadcast order so that you don't miss all the references & easter eggs for previous events/episodes.
    – Omegacron
    Commented Jul 5, 2016 at 18:40
  • 3
    So, where should I start reading this answer?
    – Suman Roy
    Commented Apr 6, 2017 at 9:38

Since you're assuming that you're going to watch all of it, I would go with the following suggestions:

  1. For the original run, watch each season in chronological order, but feel free to jump around between seasons
  2. For the reboot, watch it in chronological order.

  3. If you want to get all of the inside jokes and references, watch the original series (obeying rule (1)) before the reboot. If you just want to watch fun television, you can start with either original or reboot, or interleave them.

The reason is simple: for (1) and (2), the original was a light entertainment written and produced by many hands with no real intent to maintain long-term continuity, but often maintaining narrative development across a particular season. The idea of "spoilers" doesn't really apply: there are no secrets. (also, the idea of "canon" is somewhat nonsensical in the original series - nobody was keeping track, almost every notion is up for grabs, and any "canon" that develops is strictly local and subject to change without notice)

The reboot, on the other hand, attempts to maintain continuity across its entire run, and therefore spoilers become a concern. For example you would not want to know about... well, but that would be telling. The concept of "canon" comes into play in the reboot. (whether this is a good thing is a matter of opinion)

With regards to (3), nothing critical in the reboot depends on knowing the details of any part of the original, and everything you need to know is explained to the relevant companion as you go. Therefore if simple entertainment is your goal, you can sit back and be entertained without worry.


For the reboot series, there are cases where you can watch out of broadcast order, but there are so many arcs "Silence will fall", River Song, as well as the way the Weeping Angels are introduced and reappear, companion introductions and departures, doctor regenerations and so forth, it's probably simplest to just watch it all in broadcast order. Note that the reboot series has greater respect for series continuity than the original.

As for the original series, the stories are self-contained mostly over 2 or 4 episodes (depending on vintage), though there are cases of larger stories/arcs spanning seasons e.g. the whole Key to Time arc.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.