Back in the eighties I saw an apparently sixties-era film on afternoon UHF TV. In it a crew of men and women were on board a time-travelling vessel. I think it was not a ship, more of a stationary pod a la H.G. Wells' time machine. Through the film the crew finds themselves in troubling time-related predicaments.

I remember two of these situations, only because even at my young age it was clear to me how illogical these situations were and how great the plot holes were.

One of these situations occurred when the crew time-travels to their own recent past--a previous scene of the film, I think. But the "past" version of the crew is frozen still, and the "present" crew comes to realize it is because time is flowing for them at a greatly accelerated pace, so that the world around them is almost, but not completely, still.

Later the crew travels again to the past. While in transit to the past, the crew discovers their vessel is on a collision course, through time, with another vessel. They attempt to hail it, and fail. The only way they can survive is to fire on it, so they do, and the other vessel is destroyed, though their own takes damage.

The crew arrives in the past and they do what they set out to do (I forget what). Then they board again, to return to their own time. And on their way, they again discover their vessel is on a collision course with another vessel. And the other is hailing them! And they hear their own voices! And their transmitter is damaged so they cannot reply! The conclusion of that scene may have been left to the viewer. And all that was while they are travelling through time, in a vessel that, as far as I can remember, never spatially moves during the film.

The only reason I remember this obscure, poorly produced film at all is because the plot holes are so gaping and obvious. But as to its name, I completely fail to recall.

  • 1
    I don't see any inherent problem with the notion of a collision when moving through time but not space. Two bodies may not occupy the same point in space-time. That being said, if the timecraft crew remained stationary in space through the entire thing, the fact that the other vessel would likely be their own should have been remarkably obvious to them. Dec 28, 2014 at 17:16
  • Once you start analyzing how two timecraft moving through a metaspace or whatever could run into each other - but not into anything else - you can start listing obvious issues. Like why didn't the cast just stop the timecraft, scoot it ten feet to the side, and continue?
    – wberry
    Dec 28, 2014 at 22:49
  • 1
    That only works if the other craft also stops and "waits" for you to do that. And what if they get the same idea? With communications down, you're basically just hosed. Dec 28, 2014 at 22:51
  • 1
    But it all begs the question, if the craft ever exists in normal space anywhere between the start and end times in your journey, would you not run into it? There's a whole set of issues with the basic concept.
    – wberry
    Dec 28, 2014 at 23:15
  • 1
    It takes you time to move the craft to the side. What if that progression through time intersects with the craft that's coming towards you from the opposite temporal direction? You're painting this as obvious and foolproof but it's really not. Dec 28, 2014 at 23:15

1 Answer 1


It looks like the movie you're thinking of is "Journey to the Center of Time," from 1967, directed by David L. Hewitt, starring Scott Brady, Anthony Eisley, Abraham Sofaer and Gigi Perreau.

Overcome by greed, Stanton grabs handfuls of the precious gems, returns to the time machine, replaces the ruby and takes off without the scientists. However, on his return trip, he encounters another traveler in time. He hears a radio broadcast — it is from Manning! He is racing towards the earlier version of the time machine. Then he is destroyed by a blast initiated by his earlier self.

  • 1
    You're kidding me, the full-length movie is on YouTube! ;-) Dec 28, 2014 at 9:38
  • Yep, the "slow time" scene is at 1:16 as well. This has to be it.
    – wberry
    Dec 28, 2014 at 23:04
  • @wberry And it's full of the typical '50's and '60's sci-fi sound effects that sort of started with Forbidden Planet and carried through to the original Star Trek series. Dec 29, 2014 at 4:50
  • That's it, for sure. Jun 28, 2020 at 23:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.