Just before the Big Bang 2.0, The Doctor and Amy had this conversation:

The Doctor: There's going to be a very big bang. Big Bang Two. Try and remember your family and they'll be there.

Amy: How can I remember them if they never existed?

The Doctor: Because you're special. That crack in your wall, all that time, the universe pouring into your head. You brought Rory back. You can bring them back, too. You just remember and they'll be there.

Why did Amy need to remember her parents to bring them back? Wasn't Big Bang 2.0 supposed to do this job? Amy needed to remember The Doctor because The Doctor was at the heart of explosion (Big Bang 2.0). Why were her parents as special as The Doctor?

Also, when did she brought Rory back? The Rory there was a plastic toy designed by enemies of The Doctor. How has this anything to do with Amy's memory? The enemies only went through her childhood books.

Was The Doctor talking rubbish after being shot by a Dalek?

  • I'm about to re-watch, but as I recall its related to how Amy can bring the Doctor back into the universe purely through force of will. Can't remember how they justify it though Commented Jan 5, 2015 at 2:26
  • @Jason Are you talking about this: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/77100/…
    – user931
    Commented Jan 5, 2015 at 2:30

2 Answers 2


No, Amy would indeed have needed to remember her parents back independently.

The reason for this is a bit tricky. Looking at Series 5 is a bit like looking at water running down a hill, but in reverse. This is largely because the series is predicated on a time-loop paradox, wherein we see the effects of things before the causes.

Technically, the universe in which the characters interact for most of the series (from "The Eleventh Hour" to "The Pandorica Opens", and all of the scenes after the Doctor flies the Pandorica into the TARDIS explosion in "The Big Bang") has actually already been rebooted. And in retrospect, there is an easy way to discern this. Consider that, after we see the Doctor fly the Pandorica into the TARDIS explosion, we then see him "rewinding" along his own timeline, showing him crossing back into the settings of a few of the first twelve episodes, including one in particular - the "Remember what I wold you when you were seven" scene in the forest from "Flesh and Stone", which "The Big Bang" reveals was spoken by the (future) Doctor as he was rewinding along his timeline.

Flesh and Stone scene

And later, even further along in his rewind, this Doctor talks to a seven-year-old Amy, and tells her that the cracks "can't close properly until he is on the other side."

Big Bang scene

Now, consider the fact that this Doctor just flew the Pandorica into the TARDIS explosion and rebooted the universe using the atoms that had been preserved within the Pandorica - so what universe is he standing in right now? One that has been restored from those atoms - but also the same one in which most of Series 5 (and the show as a whole) takes place in, as he is clearly interacting with moments from his timeline before his TARDIS exploded.

So what this means is, the cracks are actually a remnant of the exploded, no-stars timeline with the museum, within the rebooted universe. As the Doctor said to seven-year-old Amy, the cracks were trying to close, but they couldn't until he allowed himself to be erased by one. So the time in which the cracks were active in the series is intrinsically linked to the time in which the post-reboot Doctor was experiencing his rewind. The cracks look like they precede the explosion, but really, they are the after-effects (a miscalculation that was also made in-story by the Alliance, who feared that the cracks signaled the end of the universe as opposed to its salvation). Which, consequently, means that when they erased things from existence, it happened after the universe had already been rebooted. Which is why Amy had to remember her parents back independently - sure, they would be restored by the reboot itself, but that's because everything was. But as I have demonstrated, the rebooted universe was what was cracked, and so even though her parents would have been restored, they would have then been erased by the cracks, which were in the process of closing, but were waiting on the post-reboot Doctor.

To try and simplify it a bit, let's look at it in (mostly) sequential order:

  1. The cracks are observed in the universe; things (Amy's parents, Rory, the Weeping Angels on the Byzantium, a number of Earth invasions, the ducks in a duck pond in Leadworth, etc.) are erased by these cracks.
  2. The Doctor and Amy travel together, experiencing the events of Series 5. This includes "Flesh and Stone", in which Amy unknowingly meets a Doctor who just rebooted the universe and is currently rewinding along his own timeline.
  3. The Doctor, Amy, and River Song gather at Stonehenge, where the Doctor is put into the Pandorica by the Alliance, who observed the cracks in time and, thinking that the cracks would lead to the end of the universe, traced their origins to the Doctor's TARDIS and constructed a trap to imprison him.
  4. While the Doctor was imprisoned in the Pandorica, the Silence blew up his TARDIS in a similarly-misguided attempt to kill him. This resulted in a "time explosion" or "total event collapse," which affected every moment in history throughout the entire universe, except for the near-Earth region of space, which was safe in the "eye of the storm."
  5. Luckily, the Doctor was able to escape from the Pandorica, and with the help of Amy, River, and a Nestene duplicate of Rory, the Doctor was able to fly the Pandorica into the exploding TARDIS, which exposed its restoration field to every point in space and time simultaneously.
  6. The universe was successfully rebooted, but there remained some "scar tissue" of the explosion in the form of the cracks, which were trying to close, but couldn't until the Doctor, who had been at the heart of the explosion during the reboot, was finally erased. The Doctor rewound along his timeline in this newly-rebooted universe, eventually crossing back over "Flesh and Stone" as well as just after the young-Amy scenes in "The Eleventh Hour", before he finally allowed himself to be erased. During this time, the cracks were observed in the universe, erasing things and prompting the Alliance to go and construct a trap for the Doctor. However, for the Amy who had already lived through all of that, she then woke up on her wedding day, now with two contradicting sets of memories in her head due to having remembered her parents back into existence. And from there it is as we saw; she has her wedding, remembers the Doctor back, and then resumes her travels with him and Rory.

As you can see, the whole reboot ordeal comprises a loop that just goes on and on. At the very least, just be aware that for the bulk of Series 5 (and, again, the show as a whole, because the Doctor would have continued to rewind if he hadn't stepped into the crack when he did), the universe has already been rebooted by events that we just have yet to see. We're seeing the effect before the cause, on a universal scale.

  • The Doctor's intervention in previous universe in Stone and Flesh has a big point. Thanks.
    – user931
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 13:32
  • This is a good theory, but I see one possible problem--if what we were seeing throughout series 5 was the new timeline generated by Big Bang Two, why were Amy's parents missing? I suspect the writers just sort of blend elements from time travel stories where history can get rewritten with elements from time travel stories where everything is constrained to be self-consistent, without thinking through the logic too carefully (you can always chalk it up to that mysterious 'timey-wimeyness'--maybe there were multiple parallel rebooted timelines, or "echoes" from one timeline in another, etc.)
    – Hypnosifl
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 14:52
  • 2
    Well, consider that we experience the show with relation to the characters' personal timestreams. Going by Amy's personal timestream, her parents were erased by the cracks (which we have established are scar tissue in the already-rebooted universe). She then grew up alone with a crack in her wall, and met the Doctor. Then she started travelling with him, and then the end of the universe happened. Just before he took off in the Pandorica, the Doctor told her that she needed to remember her parents. Which she did, which overwrote their absence in her personal past.
    – Amy
    Commented Jan 10, 2015 at 1:38
  • That is why Amy mentions having two distinct sets of memories, one with parents and one without, in the "Good Night" minisode. Because at first, her parents had been erased, until she learned in her own personal timestream that she could remember them back, did so, and then reinserted them into history, just like she did with the Doctor. Basically, time got rewritten to include them. The difference being, we see considerably more of the Doctor's time before being erased than we do of Amy's parents', while we spend far longer looking at the universe post-their erasure than we do the Doctor's.
    – Amy
    Commented Jan 10, 2015 at 1:44
  • @Amy - I don't think that really answers the question unless one explains how "personal timestreams" are related to whole-universe timelines. For example, we might imagine that if my personal timestream includes memories of events that didn't happen in the timeline I'm currently in, that's because I started out in a different timeline that matched my memories, then when I went back and changed history somehow, that brought me to a new timeline (with the other one either having been 'erased' or continuing to exist in parallel).
    – Hypnosifl
    Commented Jan 10, 2015 at 18:51

Big Bang 2.0 was supposed to restore the universe using atoms from the original universe which had been preserved inside the Pandorica before the TARDIS blew up (by transporting the Pandorica into the heart of the TARDIS explosion, they would provide its 'restoration field' with so much energy that it could use the information contained in these atoms to restore the whole universe as it was--see "Update" below for quotes on this). From the transcript of "The Big Bang":

DOCTOR: How can that Dalek even exist? It was erased from time and then it came back. How?

RORY: You said the light from the Pandorica-

DOCTOR: It's not a light, it's a restoration field. But never mind, call it a light. That light brought Amy back, restored her, but how could it bring back a Dalek when the Daleks have never existed?

AMY: Okay, tell us.

DOCTOR: When the Tardis blew up, it caused a total event collapse. A time explosion. And that explosion blasted every atom in every moment of the universe. Except-

AMY: Except inside the Pandorica.

DOCTOR: The perfect prison. And inside it, perfectly preserved, a few billion atoms of the universe as it was. In theory, you could extrapolate the whole universe from a single one of them, like, like cloning a body from a single cell. And we've got the bumper family pack.

I don't think it's entirely clear, but my guess would be that the Pandorica would only restore the universe to the state it was in at the moment the Pandorica had been sealed up (using things like minute dust particles or air molecules which had gotten inside along with the Doctor at the time, perhaps, or maybe even the atoms the Pandorica itself was made out of), in the previous episode "The Pandorica Opens". And in that episode the cracks had already erased Amy's parents, so without Amy using her special ability to fight against the memory-erasure caused by the cracks (due somehow to having lived in the room with the crack in the wall), it would just restore a universe where she had no parents.

Also see this answer to a related question, which speculates about how the cracks don't completely write people out of history, but instead leave some traces of their lives even though most people don't consciously remember them (though time travelers can be an exception to this, as established in 'Flesh and Stone' when Amy asks the Doctor how she can remember soldiers who were erased by the cracks).

Update: For reference, since you asked about this in the comments, here are some additional lines backing up the idea that the point of transporting the Pandorica into the exploding TARDIS was to provide energy to its restoration field--the "light" which had revived the Dalek, as Rory termed it in the earlier quote--so it could reboot the universe using the "memory" contained in the atoms inside it:

DOCTOR: The box contains a memory of the universe, and the light transmits the memory, and that's how we're going to do it.

AMY: Do what?

DOCTOR: Relight the fire. Reboot the universe. Come on!

RIVER: Doctor, you're being completely ridiculous. The Pandorica partially restored one Dalek. If it can't even reboot a single life form properly, how's it reboot the whole of reality?

DOCTOR: What if we give it a moment of infinite power? What if we can transmit the light from the Pandorica to every particle of space and time simultaneously?

RIVER: Well, that would be lovely, dear, but we can't, because it's completely impossible. DOCTOR: Ah no, you see, it's not. It's almost completely impossible. One spark is all we need.

RIVER: For what?

DOCTOR: Big Bang Two! Now listen.

The Doctor then gets shot by the Dalek, but when they later find him alive and well, River continues his thought:

RIVER: The Tardis is still burning. It's exploding at every point in history. If you threw the Pandorica into the explosion, right into the heart of the fire.

AMY: Then what?

RIVER: Then let there be light. The light from the Pandorica would explode everywhere at once, just like he said.

AMY: That would work? That would bring everything back?

RIVER: A restoration field powered by an exploding Tardis, happening at every moment in history. Oh, that's brilliant. It might even work. He's wired the vortex manipulator to the rest of the box.

AMY: Why?

RIVER: So he can take it with him. He's going to fly the Pandorica into the heart of the explosion.

  • 2
    Your answer is not clear. I remember The Doctor saying something about TARDIS was exploding at every moment of time and Pandorica's restoration field could exploit that. There's nothing like "the moment it had been sealed up". Also, the universe wasn't sealed up. It was erased from time.
    – user931
    Commented Jan 5, 2015 at 6:13
  • 1
    @Sachin Under normal circumstances you'd be right, but Amy's parents are a special case: because of the crack in time, the universe never contained them. So if you were to extrapolate forward from Roman-era Britain into 1996, they could not be there. When Hypnosifi talks about the universe being "sealed up", he's referring to the air inside the Pandorica, which is what gets extrapolated to reboot the universe. The "every point in time" thing is a handwave for explaining how the observably limited regeneration field could affect the whole universe at once Commented Jan 5, 2015 at 12:49
  • 1
    Also, I didn't say the universe had been sealed up--when I said "the Pandorica would only restore the universe to the state it was in at the moment it had been sealed up", the word "it" in "it had been sealed up" referred to the Pandorica being sealed up. I'll edit to avoid confusion there.
    – Hypnosifl
    Commented Jan 5, 2015 at 13:05
  • 2
    I menat "the moment the Pandorica had been sealed up" in the original timeline where all the stars hadn't blown up. Events in erased timelines can still have effects in the new timeline, time travelers in Doctor Who routinely retain memories of events that have been rewritten. And the whole point of the Doctor's explanation is that it preserved atoms from the now-erased universe--do you disagree? If so, then again, what do you think was meant by the line "inside it, perfectly preserved, a few billion atoms of the universe as it was"?
    – Hypnosifl
    Commented Jan 5, 2015 at 13:13
  • 2
    @Sachin Shekhar - The crack didn't absorb all the Weeping Angels in the universe in "Flesh and Stone", just the ones that had been in the catacombs.
    – Hypnosifl
    Commented Jan 6, 2015 at 2:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.