Watching TNG I noticed that nearly every crew member has very spacious quarters, which is something that does not seem practical on a space vessel.

Today's aircraft carriers house 3 officers to a room and 8 or more enlisted men to a room.

Why are quarters on the Enterprise-D so spacious and is there evidence that lesser crew members had more confined/shared living quarters?

  • 11
    specifically in next generation, the enterprise has many civilians as well as full families on board. the ship is meant to be almost a permanent residence. and since the saucer is meant to be detached the saucer portion is essentially a cruise ship, attached to a military vessel. – Himarm Jan 6 '15 at 17:09
  • 22
    Todays crewmembers of naval vessels can at least leave their quarters now and then and have a look at the sea and the sky. On a space ship you've got essentially nothing but empty space. Given the long mission durations it's psychologically more than prudent to make the crew comfortable and the interior of the ship inviting. Living quarters as well as the renown holodeck accomplish that. – Ghanima Jan 6 '15 at 18:37
  • 20
    I don't think the constraints of naval ships apply. There are constraints on naval ship size besides structural strength and cost of material: Ships must observe hydrodynamic principles and withstand gravity. The Enterprise does not sail through matter, nor is it required to have full maneuver range in a gravity well. – Superbest Jan 6 '15 at 20:51
  • 6
    I think it is not unreasonable to assume that federation citizens are used to a pretty high standard of living. also, they do not work for the money, they are basically all volunteers. providing nice living condition would be an incenitive to get crews. (or rather, bad conditions would deter people) – ths Jan 6 '15 at 21:19
  • 11
    @Jay - You press a button and it goes wooosh! – Valorum Jan 6 '15 at 22:11

10 Answers 10


Why the quarters are so spacious;

  • Ship space isn't at much of a premium. The ship can readily hold ten times the present crew when the need arises (for evacuation missions and emergencies) which means that for most of the time, the ship is 90% empty.

  • The Enterprise is not a military vessel. Their primary mission is one of peaceful exploration. In addition to there being a considerable number of civilians on board, the crew are not expected to maintain military discipline in their quarters. Providing them with spacious accommodation would obviously lead to less stress and a happier and more productive crew.

The TNG Technical Manual has this to say on the subject;

Starfleet believes that providing comfortable living quarters to all crew and attached personnel to be of primary importance. Indeed, living accommodations are one of the most visible displays of Starfleet's commitment to caring for its single most important "system," its people.


The living areas of the starship have been designed for maximum comfort and safety while the crew is conducting a mission. Long-term studies of humanoid cultures have confirmed that as each race embarked upon permanent occupation of space, large personal living spaces had to be established, especially on early sublight expeditions. The Enterprise allows for some 110 square meters of living space per person, in addition to community space and the areas allocated to purely working functions.

While some engineers on the Galaxy Class Project questioned the relatively large size of the vessel, opting for a smaller, more efficient design, it was conceded that the large size provided a greater number of mission options, given the changing social, political, and economic conditions in the Milky Way.

Do lesser crew members have less space?

Yes, crew quarters aboard the Enterprise-D (at least for Starfleet personnel) are assigned and sized according to rank. In the episode TNG : Lower Decks, we learn that enlisted crewpersons are required to share quarters until they reach the rank of Lieutenant.

LAVELLE : Promote me, please -- so I can make Lieutenant and have my own room.

TAURIK : If you aren't happy sharing quarters with me, then you should put in for a new room assignment. Just in case you're not promoted.

Above the junior ranks, Senior officers are provided with staterooms and at least one extra room for work/study. Picard and Riker use this extra space as separated visiting areas, Data uses his extra room as a private workspace and Troi uses hers as an informal workroom with her famously messy desk. The ship also contains "apartments" for officers who choose to bring their families on board, comprised of two normal sets of quarters combined into a single living area.

Picard's quarters

|improve this answer|||||
  • 38
    Out of universe, it's a hell of a lot easier to film in a larger space. You have far more choices regarding angles and lighting. – Valorum Jan 6 '15 at 19:22
  • 4
    Years ago I read an article by someone involved in producing the original series, and he commented that he would think that in real life, corridors on a space ship would be very narrow. The real reason why the corridors on the Enterprise were so wide, he said, was to make room for the cameras and lights. – Jay Jan 6 '15 at 21:59
  • 6
    110 m^2 of living space is about 3 times more space than my family and I have now. Of course, I have easy access to much more community space (i.e. my entire community) than I would on a starship. On the other hand, I don't have any access to a holodeck so I still have to travel to experience new lands. – Johnny Jan 6 '15 at 22:39
  • 4
    @Johnny, if I remember correctly, the Enterprise has fewer than 5 holodecks for a crew that numbers in the hundereds, so it seems as if the only reason we see the holodeck being used so much by the same people is that the senior officers are the primary users of the holodeck. – k_g Jan 6 '15 at 23:31
  • 6
    @einpoklum - Nope. Uh-huh. Starfleet is not a military organisation – Valorum Jan 8 '15 at 22:24

The typical U.S. Navy deployment for a submarine or a surface ship is 3-6 months. In Star Fleet, the exploration missions last for years. NX-01 ultimately completed a 10 year mission of exploration. The NCC-1701 Enterprise originally had a 5 year mission. That is a long time to be in a ship.

From Memory-Alpha

Crew's quarters: The majority of the enlisted crew and junior officers share quarters and bunk areas on small- to medium-sized vessels. (VOY: "Flashback") On starships of the Constitution-class, crew's quarters were structured as double suites, with private sleeping areas sharing a common, central bathroom. On starships of the Galaxy-class, crewmembers ranked Lieutenant junior grade or higher are given their own quarters while personnel up to the rank of ensign are required to share quarters. (TNG: "Lower Decks")

Officers' quarters: Many starships feature separate quarters for higher-ranked officers. Usually, these staterooms are composed of two or more areas, featuring separate bed- and bathrooms and a dedicated work- and living area. (TNG: "Schisms")

Since the show focuses on the officers, with the only NCO of note bring Chief O'Brien (who has a family) we don't see much of the lower ranked officers or NCO quarters for regular crewmen. Here is an image of a room with double bunks and a common area.

enter image description here

As ships become larger, so do the accomodations. Here is a similar bunk bed situation on the NX-01

enter image description here

|improve this answer|||||
  • 2
    You've answered the what, but not the why. – Valorum Jan 6 '15 at 18:02
  • Also, a bit too focused on Trek:Enterprise. – Valorum Jan 6 '15 at 18:03
  • Do we ever see (Ensign) Wesley Crusher's accomodations, or does he live with his mother the entire time? – Joe Jan 7 '15 at 22:52
  • @Joe He does live with his mother. – Jack B Nimble Jan 7 '15 at 23:44
  • 1
    Also, in the US Navy you get paid. Maybe should compare with a voluntary naval organisation (the RNLI? Greenpeace ships or Sea Shepherd?) instead. – A E Jan 8 '15 at 11:04

Modern warships have crew quarters that are extremely spacious compared to 18th century warships (which gave each man a space 14" wide in which to hang his hammock). Star Trek is merely extrapolating that trend into the future.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 7
    Plus, the Enterprise is not a warship to begin with. What's the cabin size on the USS Defiant? – DevSolar Jan 7 '15 at 12:00

Somewhere, maybe even "Making of Star Trek" back in the 60s, Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry was quoted as wishing to treat members of his space crew with a little more respect than one gets in the real-world navy. For the pilot episodes, the captains' quarters were designed per the producers' wishes; Kirk's was nice size, Picard's even bigger. For money reasons, those same rooms were reused when filming anyone else's quarters.

If you look at the deck plans sold for the 1701 ($5 in the 1970s!) and the 1701-D, they resemble cruise ships inside, with crew quarters stashed everywhere. In the 1701 plans, most rooms had 2 beds (I think).

|improve this answer|||||
  • "Picard's even bigger. For money reasons, those same rooms were reused when filming anyone else's quarters. " - While that is true for TOS, in TNG, there are at least two sets of quarters; senior officers (Riker, Dr. Crusher, Troi), as well as occasional high-ranking guests, use the same set as Picard's quarters, while for everyone else, the somewhat smaller junior officers' quarters sets were used, sometimes subdivided or extended with removable walls. – O. R. Mapper Jan 7 '15 at 9:45

It might sound trite, but I believe the main reason is because they can. The technology of the Federation allows starships with comfortable quarters. Sure, they could have extra phasers or cargo holds in that volume, but could they power those phasers? Do they need that cargo?

|improve this answer|||||
  • 4
    There are actual in-canon and logical reasons for the massive quarters, as mentioned in the other answers. – Tritium21 Jan 6 '15 at 20:07
  • @Tritium21: ... and this is one of them. As mentioned in this answer. :) – Lightness Races in Orbit Jun 21 '16 at 23:30

So many great answers. Wanted to throw in a few. Clearly, the out-of-world explanation helps explain the reality of the situation - big sets, easier to shoot (the TNG series was filmed on some fairly large studio equipment from the 1980s, cameras with wheels and tracks and such), and generally looks more glamorous, so it fits the theme of a Utopian-like future (for humanity, at least).

In-universe the long-duration missions are used to explain all "luxury-like" accommodations included (schools, arboretum, holodecks). It is established in "Lower Decks" that not everyone enjoys large quarters but our primary characters all have a good amount of space (similar to all the Trek series, excepting maybe Enterprise).

Technologically, it also makes more sense than it would on a modern day aircraft carrier. First, modern day aircraft carriers (from the US Fleet) have a personnel complement much higher. The recently deactivated USS Enterprise CVN65, for example, housed up to 4,600. TNG's Enterprise only houses ~1000 (including civilian families) with much larger emergency capacity.

Further, the Navy has to worry about gravity, whereas the Enterprise-D has to worry about structure. The larger those naval quarters, the more deck space, the more weight, the more furniture, etc. (just think how much space replicator functionality would save, food has to be stored somewhere). All of that mass adds up, so it's not so much that space is at a premium as it is mass. They could make bigger aircraft carriers but then they'd be even bulkier and more difficult to move, maintain and protect.

The Enterprise-D, with it's technology, just needs to form a stable warp-bubble and voila the "weight" of the thing is irrelevant. So you can afford spacious accommodations, large cargo decks, large shuttle bays (even the ones we see on camera were many times larger than the most efficient bay could imagine; ENT's shuttle bays for example) because your concern is the structural integrity of the vessel, not the weight.

The same could be said of modern spacecraft, things are tight because it's expensive to rocket all that mass into orbit. However, designs have been discussed like "inflatable spacecraft" that would allow relatively spacious accommodations. Just a matter of maintaining the integrity of the space vessel.

So, in-universe it makes sense that they'd have spacious quarters to match the rest of the spacious nature of the vessel. (Fun question)

|improve this answer|||||
  • The more the Replicators are used the more energy that needs to be created, which means more fuel that needs to be stored. I don't think there is going to be as much difference in storage as you think, maybe it would be easier to store and food could be stored longer (because it's energy and not actually food) – Malachi Jan 8 '15 at 16:56
  • 1
    @Malachi Fuel storage is pretty compact, however. They are using fusion along with even more efficient future tech, after all. And a lot of the energy for the replicators is recycled. It's so close to 100% that on Voyager, even with low replicator rations, they still go ahead and replicate the cups and dishes and then recycle them into the replicator, rather than reuse them to save energy. – trlkly Jan 8 '15 at 22:45
  • Good Point @trlkly. – Malachi Jan 8 '15 at 23:09

There are some pretty good answers here giving design philosophy etc. but lets just do a little rough math on the problem.

The Enterprise D is nearly 50 times the size of the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (4.5 million tonnes vs. 95,000 tonnes displacement) yet it has a crew of 1012 against the 4600 crew of the carrier. Now NG Enterprise D has families as well so lets double its crew and add a little more to get 2300 or half the crew of the carrier (remember many of the crew are single). This means that if the Enterprise D gave up as much of its space percentage wise as the carrier Enterprise, then each crew member would get 50 X 2 = 100 times the room available.

So now the enlisted crew instead of getting to share 1 room with 8 gets 12.5 rooms all to themselves. Space on a ship the size of the Enterprise D simply would not be a issue; the ship architects can give spacious quarters quite easily without compromising other design needs of a starship. Various supplements to Star Trek have shown that lower ranks do get smaller rooms then officers which is traditional in naval vessels.

|improve this answer|||||
  • This is assuming that the whole ship is given over to living space, or that entire sections of the ship aren't devoted to other activities. – Valorum Oct 11 '16 at 19:28

Galaxy Class is an Explorer, to say the least, also a century since Starfleets prior vessels quarter size grew with technical complexity. As an explorer type it's got enough space (Cargo) to store several years worth of resources (spare parts, food stuffs, fuel) People just don't understand how big it is. You could have the ENTIRE 1000 person crew on a single deck. For comparisons sake a Galaxy class has 1000 crew aboard with room for families and children. An aircraft carrier holds 5500 on board (albeit the enlisted crew is triple bunked), The Titanic has room for 2000 passengers and 800 crew. enter image description here

|improve this answer|||||
  • 1
    Could you highlight how many people are commonly found on the other scale items? – Valorum yesterday

On the debate about replicators being space-saving – The energy matrix required to form dishes as well as the food itself can be just as easily de-materialized and is reclaimed as 'free' energy back into the EPS system. They function on technology similar to that of transporters, but with lower resolution. Another thing to consider is waste processing and reclamation. All biological wastes are fed into a processing location where, basically, those materials are vaporized into the same kind of energy and fed into the system. If you think about it in a strictly linear sense, it's kind of 'gross'. However, it's very efficient, which means that there is less deuterium and anti-deuterium consumed to create the energy needed for the process.

In the Trek verse, Matter/Anti-Matter Reactor Assemblies (MARAs) – a.k.a. the Warp Core – can produce tremendous amounts of energy from very little matter. This is in addition to what supplemental fusion reactors aboard ship also produce, which have also become remarkably efficient and compact. A Next Generation fusion reactor could fit into your bedroom without much extra needed. Oh, and they're much safer.

Another thing to consider is that, on the matter of structure, all TNG era and beyond Trek vessels and stations have 'structural integrity fields', which are basically reinforcing forcefields that snap on when needed to reinforce materials and points of stress. Concerns for size and mass are somewhat mitigated by the usage of these fields, especially during combat or other emergency situations. Federation ships are meant to be tough, and are designed for survivability. It was stated in another answer that a five- to ten-year mission out in the black, often with little to no support, is not uncommon.

These elements do play into the consideration when considering the size of quarters.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 1
    Reclaimed free energy? Vaporized into energy? Your second paragraph does indicate where a starship's very large energy budget comes from, but that energy is used to do work, and the first paragraph is full of unsupported claims. – T.J.L. Jan 2 '19 at 15:32

As many other have already stated, the Enterprise D was a cruise ship attached to a military vessel. One of the key things to remember is that on the 178 episodes of The Next Generation we saw a VERY small percentage of the interior spaces of the ship. The saucer module was where the vast majority of the living and recreational spaces were contained. In the show, the saucer module was about 1000 feet across from port to starboard and 16 decks high from the bridge on deck one to the Captain's Yacht on deck 16. We only saw a small sampling of crew quarters, some cargo bays, sickbay, the transporter room, a couple of lounges and ten-forward, sickbay, and the holodeck. There were complete blueprints drawn up for the entire ship that showed schools, restaurants, and five-deck high mall/promenade, aquatic research labs, a two-deck theater, and much more. The budget constraints of the production limited what we saw on TV, but in-universe the ship was intended to be a city-in-space for over 1000 officers, civilians, and even children and spouses. The USS Voyager was shown to be much smaller but also quite spacious relative to the number of people onboard. The USS Defiant was much more akin to the accommodations of a modern naval vessel with shared accommodations for all crew and very tight interior spaces. The galaxy-class Enterprise-D was not necessarily representative of life on every Starfleet vessel.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 1
    The saucer was not a cruise vessel and the Federation isn't a military. – Valorum Oct 16 '16 at 10:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.