In the books, Tolkien tells us about an unknown type of Easterling that no one has ever seen before. They were said to be swarthy skinned, small and sturdy much like a dwarf and have beards (Return of the King, The Siege of Gondor):

...countless companies of Men of a new sort that we have not met before. Not tall, but broad and grim, bearded like dwarves, wielding great axes. Out of some savage land in the wide East they come, we deem.

We know 4 out of the 7 dwarf families resided in Rhun which was under Sauron's influence.

Is there any indication or evidence that may say they were in fact dwarves from Rhun?

  • Good question - I completely missed that part.
    – Omegacron
    Commented Jan 21, 2015 at 16:32
  • 1
    Only the beards are like those of the dwarves, not the other features.
    – algiogia
    Commented Jan 21, 2015 at 16:55
  • 1
    @algiogia Only the beards are specifically said to be dwarf-like, but "not tall" and "broad" and "grim" and "wielding great axes" also fit the Dwarf aesthetic. Darth's answer makes it clear that they weren't actually Dwarves, but it seems that they could be culturally connected to the Dwarves of the East (like how Italy was culturally influenced by Greece, without being literally Greek).
    – Nerrolken
    Commented Jan 21, 2015 at 18:12

2 Answers 2


There's no such indication. Quite the opposite in fact; there is indication in the books that the Eastern Dwarves were not under Sauron's domination.

One example is that the War of the Dwarves and the Orcs is noted to have involved all of the Dwarf families, as Lord of the Rings Appendix A notes:

Thráin at once sent messengers bearing the tale, north, east, and west; but it was three years before the Dwarves had mustered their strength. Durin's Folk gathered all their host, and they were joined by great forces sent from the Houses of other Fathers; for this dishonour to the heir of the Eldest of their race filled them with wrath.

This confirms that the Dwarves were united, and that the Eastern Dwarves did fight against forces of Sauron. This is also supported by the essay Of Dwarves and Men (in History of Middle-earth 12), which also introduces the concept that the Dwarf families were in communication with each other:

Though these four points were far sundered the Dwarves of different kindreds were in communication, and in the early ages often held assemblies of delegates at Mount Gundabad. In times of great need even the most distant would send help to any of their people; as was the case in the great War against the Orcs (Third Age 2793 to 2799).

Additionally, the essay Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age (in the Silmarillion) notes that Sauron failed to dominate the Dwarves with the rings he gave them:

The Dwarves indeed proved tough and hard to tame; they ill endure the domination of others, and the thoughts of their hearts are hard to fathom, nor can they be turned to shadows. They used their rings only for the getting of wealth; but wrath and an over-mastering greed of gold were kindled in their hearts, of which evil enough after came to the profit of Sauron.

So the most likely explanation is that these were just Men, and that nothing significant should be read into the "not tall, but broad and grim, bearded like dwarves, wielding great axes" description.

  • 2
    There would also be some distance between a 'not tall' man at, say, 5 and a half feet to a dwarf at about 4 foot tall.
    – Oldcat
    Commented Jan 21, 2015 at 19:09
  • Technically it doesn't say "from all the houses"
    – OrangeDog
    Commented Nov 15, 2016 at 19:06

As others have mentioned there is no other indication if these swarthy men were in fact dwarves. However, Dwarves did fight for Sauron in the Last Alliance. So I would think it is possible for some of the eastern Dwarven families to fight for Sauron once again.

Here is a quote from the Silmarillion on the Last Alliance

"Of the Dwarves few fought upon either side; but the kindred of Durin of Moria fought against Sauron."

  • You might want to edit your answer, rewording it so it reads as a response to the question.  Currently, it reads as a response to the other answer.  (You can mention the other answer in your answer, but your focus should be on answering the question.) Commented Nov 2, 2016 at 4:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.