0

Had Harry had not interfered with Professor Quirrell/Lord Voldemort when they go into the final room with the Mirror of Erised, Dumbledore and Snape could have easily cornered and trapped them during their exit, or maybe in the room itself. In this case, maybe Quirrell and Voldemort would not have gotten the Philosopher's Stone.

If Dumbledore and Snape could have captured them alive, they could have jailed them or put them in a secluded room from which escape was impossible. They could have kept Voldemort alive with small doses of Unicorn blood, small enough amounts that Voldemort wouldn't die, but also wouldn't have the energy to do magic.

Thus, the whole set of problems that occur further along in the story would have been easily averted.

Would this have been possible in any way?

(If this would have happened, maybe the Death Eaters would have hijacked the Hogwarts Express and demanded the release of Voldemort).

closed as primarily opinion-based by TGnat, Möoz, Ward, Tango, Major Stackings Feb 2 '15 at 6:19

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2

My answer would be no. This would not be possible.

Voldemort is evidently the most powerful dark wizard in the world. When he ruled, there was fear amongst everyone, terror across the world.

Every week, news comes of more deaths, more disappearances, more torturing ... The Ministry of Magic’s in disarray, they don’t know what to do, they’re trying to keep everything hidden from the Muggles, but meanwhile, Muggles are dying too. Terror everywhere ... panic ... confusion ... that’s how it used to be. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

Severus against Voldemort, he doesn't stand a chance. Dumbledore on the other hand, is the only wizard that Voldemort ever feared. Dumbledore could have dueled for an exceptionally long time, but remember what Dumbledore said himself?

"You flatter me," said Dumbledore calmly. "Voldemort had powers I will never have."

This said, Voldemort may not be the better wizard, but in fact have Dark Magic that Dumbledore wouldn't dare to use. Using this magic may have made their powers on par. Even then, Voldemort was still weak at that time.

I have strength enough for this.

Voldemort in Philosophers Stone.

As to an inescapable room, I highly doubt that would be possible. Azkaban has had many breakouts, but is still probably one of the best and secure jails. The most the Ministry would possibly do is to make a new "jail", specifically for Voldemort, due to his past.

You could keep giving Quirrell food, but as per spookypeanut answer, I believe that Voldemort would possess Quirrell not to eat it. If Quirrell dies, Voldemort would transform into a misty, ghost like substance, and escape would be easier.

You also said, "the whole set of problems that occur further along in the story would have been easily averted." Out of universe, the whole entire series revolves around Harry and Voldemort. Even if he was captured, there would be no story whatsoever.

Also, remember this is Voldemort that we are talking about. It may be Quirrell's body, but he had the Wrath of Voldemort behind him this entire time. To try to bring Voldemort to justice, to a jail cell, is the equivalent of Earth shifting it's course away from the sun.

0

Given how weak-minded Quirrell is, I would suggest that it would have been easy for Voldemort to persuade his body to die. Also, there's nothing to suggest that if Voldemort has been brought back (as in at the end of GoF), that he wouldn't disappear from Quirrell. So while it may have been possible to keep him contained, I would speculate that nothing would have been gained by it: anything that would bring him back to life would still work.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.