I just finished Bank's "Surface Detail" Culture-universe novel. Great stuff, although my reading of it was rather interrupted and spread over almost 3 months, so my memory of the earlier parts is greatly diminished.

The last line in it feels like it's supposed to be closure of some great narrative arc, and/or reveal something surprising and new about the character concerned... except the name mentioned is completely lost on me!

What am I missing here (if anything) ?

By the way, the last line is

Your table is ready, Mr. Zakalwe.

  • 2
    The question would be much improved by quoting the line you are asking about. Put it in a spoiler box (>! is the markup you want). – dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Dec 26 '11 at 17:59
  • Thanks, updated. Actually, just googling the phrase turns up a load of discussion on other forums. I'd assumed at most it would be a reference back to an earlier minor character in the same book I'd forgotten about because of my interrupted reading. – timday Dec 26 '11 at 21:57
  • When I reached that last line I laughed out loud. I felt as if it was a little jest just for the benefit of those familiar with Banks' early works, especially as "Use of Weapons" is one of my favourites. – user59247 Jan 13 '16 at 18:05

Spoiler for Surface Detail:

Zakalwe is the protagonist (I will not say hero) of Banks's earlier novel Use of Weapons, so we gain some new retroactive insight into the character who has now been revealed to be Zakalwe.

| improve this answer | |
  • Thanks! A great arc indeed. I see the relevant wikipedia page (not "Surface Detail"'s) does contain a mention of the reference in SD. – timday Dec 26 '11 at 17:09
  • 1
    Actually, personally I thought it was rather pointless, and didn't add anything to either book. But maybe that's just me. – Daniel Roseman Dec 26 '11 at 21:13
  • 3
    I know what you mean. One of the things I like about the Culture books is that all the books pretty much stand alone (references to big events like the Idiran War excepted)... and this seems a bit of an unnecessary entanglement between books. On the other hand, in the context of Bank's assertion that the idea of the Culture originated simply to serve as a suitable backdrop for the character in question (see textualities.net/andrew-wilson/iain-banks-interview ), I think he arguably has more right than most to be deserving of such treatment. – timday Dec 26 '11 at 22:25

There are two levels of importance:

Firstly, Zakalwe is a character in a previous Culture novel, so it can be seen as a homage. Secondly, Zakalwe is a Special Circumstances asset specifically used to influence the outcome of wars the Culture can't directly be involved in. It thus implies that the Culture, while publicly staying out of the war over hells, was actually involved through SC, who employed one of the greatest naturally created military strategists ever to have existed to influence the outcome. It significantly changes character of the overall plot, since it shows that the Culture actually would never have let hells continue to exist, but were able to find a more direct way to remove them.

| improve this answer | |

At a Q&A in 2012 for the Guardian Banks was asked why he chose to add that line, and from memory he said that it just seemed to fit.

That is, the character in SD didn't necessarily start out as being linked anything else (as timday says - the book could stand on its own) but that it felt right to make linkage

(Clumsily trying to avoid spoilers)

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.