This question already has an answer here:
From what I've been seeing and reading Robb Stark's plan does not make ANY sense.
What is the point of attacking the south rather than just holding the north? At the end of the day control of a land is only there if there are men to hold it. Why not just stay in Winterfell and rule the North as it's own kingdom? Perhaps build a wall or check point or two on the southern border to hold off southern invading forces.
This question is different from its supposed duplicate Was the rebellion of the North really necessary? because it is not about whether the rebellion should have happened. Independence is not official until it is recognized publicly unlike the contention in the duplicate.
This question is about his tactics to secure independence.