36

In Order of the Phoenix, Dumbledore can't find a new DADA teacher, so they get Umbridge. But if he is the Headmaster, and the only one Voldemort ever feared, why couldn't he take up the teacher? He does seem like the most qualified person.

  • 9
    In my experience, relatively few headmasters still teach regularly. – Valorum May 5 '15 at 19:40
  • 35
    Because his initials are AD, and ADDADA is too many AD's. – Gorchestopher H May 5 '15 at 20:34
  • 9
    You're basically asking him to do two full-time jobs simultaneously, on top of his work in the Order. He's not as young as he used to be! – Harry Johnston May 5 '15 at 23:29
  • 10
    The real question is - why didn't he take Moody? Moody never started teaching so he was not affected by the course, he could stay for another year as himself. – Sulthan May 6 '15 at 9:49
  • 3
    @alexwlchan another thing is, how many parents where informed that moody was an impostor? did the regular kids even know that the whole year they had an impostor moody? – Himarm May 6 '15 at 13:07
51

Several reasons spring to mind:

  1. The curse on the job.

    As is well-known, Voldemort placed a curse on the DADA job preventing any one teacher from holding the post for more than a year. The last four teachers have all left the school in unpleasant circumstances.

    Although Dumbledore is a competent wizard, and one of the few people who Voldemort fears, it would be silly to place himself in harm’s way by taking the position and subjecting himself to the curse. It’s not worth the risk, especially given his importance as both headmaster and head of the Order.

  2. The political situation surrounding Dumbledore.

    Fudge suspects Dumbledore is getting ready to overthrow him. Taking up the DADA post would play right into these suspicions, and seem to confirm Fudge’s worst fears – that Dumbledore was using his students to build an anti-Ministry army. (Look at the fit they throw when they discover “Dumbledore’s Army” later in the book.)

    He’s already on shaky ground with the Ministry after bailing Harry out at his hearing. He doesn’t need to give Fudge more reasons to come after him.

  3. He has other, more important, things to do.

    His work in the Order means he’s often away from Hogwarts, whether that’s at Grimmauld Place, looking for horcruxes, or something else. It would be difficult to keep up a regular timetable and lead the anti-Voldemort efforts. When push comes to shove, teaching would take a back seat to his real-life DADA work.

    It’s probably better to let somebody else run the DADA classes, so the students get a consistent teaching experience, rather than the patchy one they’d get under Dumbledore. (Especially given the heightened importance of DADA after Voldemort’s return.)

  • 1
    @11684: it's not mentioned in the books; I think it was an interview or Pottermorw update. Quirrel taught Muggle Studies, went off to Albania for a year, then came back to teach DADA. – alexwlchan May 6 '15 at 11:15
  • 2
    surely your point 2. is the canon answer? Per the books/movie, when Hermione and Harry are discussing Umbridge's appointment and what is means for the school, Hermione says "Don't you see what this means? It means that the Ministry is interferring at Hogwarts". (Or similar. Sorry, might be paraphrasing as I've not looked up the exact quote). The answer isn't necessarily that Dumbledore could not have been DADA teacher, it's that Umbridge had to be DADA teacher because the Ministry wanted to place someone in Hogwarts and to exert influence. – The Giant of Lannister May 6 '15 at 11:35
  • 2
    Good, thorough answer. Point 1 sounds like the best reason, tho. Dumbledore knew that nobody had kept the job for more than a year since his meeting with Volemort about taking the job. He would not, at that stage, have endangered his life and/or wellbeing in that way. – AJFaraday May 6 '15 at 12:10
  • 4
    @11684 Did Voldemort actually curse the DADA job? – David K May 6 '15 at 12:39
  • 1
    @TheGiantofLannister I would have a hard time believing Voldemort foresaw the need to except some teachers when casting the spell and at the time of his taking over Quirrell, he certainly was in no condition to alter a curse so powerful even Dumbledore couldn't lift it. – 11684 May 6 '15 at 12:43
8

I think Dumbledore was perfectly aware, that he, and only he, was powerful enough to counter Voldemort. At the end of GoF, he realized that Voldemort indeed had found backdoor to life, so he started his journeys to seek clues and also aid the Order itself.

So why he didn't teach ? Yes, he allowed a ministry spy in Hogwarts, but he knew that his time is more useful somewhere else. He was fighting to win the war, not the battle.

4

The answer isn't necessarily that Dumbledore could not have been DADA teacher, it's that Umbridge had to be DADA teacher because the Ministry wanted to place someone in Hogwarts and to exert influence.

By book 5, the Ministry (in particular, Cornelius Fudge) is becoming increasingly paranoid. Terrified at the thought of Voldemort's return, Fudge is determined to deny Voldemort is back and becomes convinced that there is some kind of conspiracy involving Dumbledore and Potter whereby Dumbledore (who is greatly respected, in general, by the wizarding community) is trying to take control of the Ministry and oust Fudge.

Thus Fudge begins a systematic campaign to counter Dumbledore. He interferes with Hogwarts (placing Dolores Umbridge at the school and subsequently giving her great and wide-ranging powers as Hogwarts High Inquisitor. He also influences the Daily Prophet to run a (pretty successful) propaganda campaign to discredit Harry and Dumbledore.

Fudge and the Ministry wanted to undermine Dumbledore, and the best way to do so was from within Hogwarts - Dumbledore's home so to speak - hence, placing a teacher at Hogwarts. The DADA position just happened to be open and that is why Umbridge ended up being placed in that position over others.

Certainly, Dumbledore was more qualified to teach DADA than Umbridge. But even if he had wanted to (and it is not certain he did, as the position would have been a burden on his free time to pursue other important activities) Dumbledore could not have refused Umbridge's appointment without serious implications for his own position within the political context of the time.

  • The MoM was only able to make such an appointment if the DADA position was unfilled. Umbridge would not have been appointed as the DADA teacher if Dumbledore was able to find a suitable candidate for the position himself. There were no others. – Ellesedil May 6 '15 at 21:19
2

Or, considering that Dumbledore was unwilling to reign in excesses from the students (Draco, Ron, Luna's abusers) and staff (Snape) properly, allowing rampant bullying, incompetence (Binns) and outright child abuse (Snape, Harry's relatives, Umbridge), perhaps he just didn't care enough to put forth the effort.

In a world with magical oaths, unbreakable vows and potions such as Veritaserum, it's not like he didn't have the ability to prevent such occurrences. Therefore, if he didn't, that means he's unwilling.

0

I would have thought the simple answer is just that he's too busy.

When was the last time the head master of any school actually taught the students? They're far too busy doing other important matters: meetings, paperwork, securing funding, paperwork, organising events, paperwork.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.