8

'Tell him that on the night Lord Voldemort tried to kill him, when Lily cast her own life between them as a shield, the Killing Curse rebounded upon Lord Voldemort, and a fragment of Voldemort's soul was blasted apart from the whole, and latched itself on to the only living soul left in that collapsing building. Part of Lord Voldemort lives inside Harry...'

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - pp.550-1 - Bloomsbury - chapter 33, The Prince's Tale

What we have here, then, is a soul fragment existing outside of a body for long enough to "latch itself on to" another host, when its body is destroyed.

Why, then, can this not happen again? Why is the soul fragment destroyed in the Forbidden Forest, when Voldemort hits Harry with a Killing Curse? Why does the fragment of Voldemort's soul, blasted apart from its new host, not "[latch] itself on to [any] living soul" in the forest?

I answer this by saying that it is simply the nature of Horcruxes.

'But even if we wreck the thing it lives in,' said Ron, 'why can't the bit of soul in it just go and live in something else?'

'Because a Horcrux is the complete opposite of a human being.'

...

'Look, if I picked up a sword right now, Ron, and ran you through with it, I wouldn't damage your soul at all.'

...

'...But my point is that whatever happens to your body, your soul will survive, untouched,' said Hermione. 'But it's the other way round with a Horcrux. The fragment of soul inside it depends on its container, its enchanted body, for survival. It can't exist without it.'

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - p.90 - Bloomsbury - chapter 6, The Ghoul in Pyjamas

But then I ask myself - well, if soul fragments can be blasted apart from the whole and latch onto other souls, why couldn't that happen again in the Forest? If Harry had been made into a physical Horcrux - like the others - I could sort of understand. A piece of soul is consciously transferred into an object, on which it then becomes dependent, because, of course, it's just a little fragment - not able to exist on its own, outside of its new container. But the soul fragment that latched itself onto Harry was not transferred by whatever the standard Horcrux creating spell is. More importantly, that fragment certainly was able to exist on its own and find a new body (much like the bit of soul that existed in the Forest of Albania during Voldemort's exile, and later had a body resurrected around it).

So, does anybody have anything more concrete to add on this. Hermione's explanation is okay, but it just seems a bit ... unsatisfying. I wouldn't say this is an out and out plothole, it just feels like the magic is ... arbitrary. And JK Rowling has generally taken great pride in making her magic consistent and making it make sense.

  • I would imagine it's because the Avada Kedavra spell effectively killed that soul fragment. It doesn't attach to anything else because it's no longer alive. – Arturo Torres Sánchez May 23 '15 at 0:16
  • Well, when the Killing Curse hits a person it doesn't destroy the soul (hence Voldemort's soul surviving the rebounded curse) 'Look, if I picked up a sword right now, Ron, and ran you through with it, I wouldn't damage your soul at all.' When a Horcrux is destroyed, the soul does indeed die with it. But that's the point of the question really. Why is the soul fragment able to survive the initial destruction of Voldemort's body, but not the second destruction of Harry's? Why does the soul fragment die with Harry, when the piece of soul is not transferred to him as with normal Horcruxes. – Au101 May 23 '15 at 0:20
  • Why can a bit of soul come apart from its host and float around into another person on one occasion, but not a second occasion? Something seems a bit ... hand-wavey there. – Au101 May 23 '15 at 0:22
  • 1
    really good question. JK goes out of her way to emphasise that Harry is NOT a horcrux. So why, then, does the soul fragment within Harry behave like a soul fragment contained in a horcrux? – The Giant of Lannister May 23 '15 at 15:05
  • 1
    I don't think that's really true. Harry could've gone "on" if he'd wanted to, Dumbledore says as much, and he goes to King's Cross. Secondly, Voldemort's soul fragment doesn't seem to be "destroyed", unless I've mistaken what's flailing under the chair in King's Cross. And thirdly, Avada Kedavra doesn't usually harm souls, does it? The curse causes a bit of Voldemort's destabilised soul to break off in Godric's Hollow but it doesn't destroy the soul. Nor does Voldemort's curse harm Harry's soul in the Forbidden Forest. – Au101 May 24 '15 at 14:50
1

The Dark Lord’s main soul split while his Horcruxes tied it to life.

When the Killing Curse rebounded on the Dark Lord, it ripped him from his body and fractured a piece off of his main soul, and that piece went on to live in Harry as he’s a living host and souls that aren’t intentionally encased in a Horcrux object naturally only live in living beings.

“Tell him that on the night Lord Voldemort tried to kill him, when Lily cast her own life between them as a shield, the Killing Curse rebounded upon Lord Voldemort, and a fragment of Voldemort’s soul was blasted apart from the whole, and latched itself on to the only living soul left in that collapsing building.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 33 (The Prince’s Tale)

At that point, the Dark Lord’s main soul was tied to life by the Horcruxes, so when it split, both pieces remained alive as the main soul cannot move on while there are Horcruxes tying it to life.

“Well, you split your soul, you see,’ said Slughorn, ‘and hide part of it in an object outside the body. Then, even if one’s body is attacked or destroyed, one cannot die, for part of the soul remains earthbound and undamaged. But, of course, existence in such a form …”
- Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 23 (Horcruxes)

The piece that fractured off was still part of the main soul until it did, so it was also tied to life then.

In the Forbidden Forest, nothing tied the fragment to life - it died.

The second time the Dark Lord hits Harry with the Killing Curse, the soul fragment is already separate from his main soul, and therefore no longer tied to life by the Horcruxes. Since nothing tied it to life, it was simply killed when the Dark Lord’s Killing Curse hit Harry, and it in him.

“So the part of his soul that was in me …’ Dumbledore nodded still more enthusiastically, urging Harry onwards, a broad smile of encouragement on his face. ‘… has it gone?’

‘Oh, yes!’ said Dumbledore. ‘Yes, he destroyed it. Your soul is whole, and completely your own, Harry.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 35 (King’s Cross)

There was nothing keeping the soul fragment alive, so the Killing Curse killed it once it hit.

3

Good question! As far as I know, this can only really be answered by speculation, so here we go...

TL;DR - Avada Kedavra weirdness and the unusual circumstances of that first night.


Avada Kedavra and the soul

As we know, souls in HP are bound to bodies, but cannot be physically harmed. If the person is killed, the link between the soul and body is broken and (usually) the soul moves on. Almost all curses work in such as way as to hurt the body, causing death.

Except Avada Kedavra. The Killing Curse does no physical harm. Unlike all other curses, it doesn't seem to affect the body at all - it skips the middle man and just moves the soul on, causing instant death. No fuss, no muss. This is exactly how it normally works and exactly what happened to Harry in the forest. Avada Kedavra does no physical harm.

...except the night Harry's parents were killed.

The First Night

I think a lot if it comes down to the circumstances in which the fragment was created - the incredibly unusual circumstances of a rebounding killing curse hitting a wizard with several Horcruxes, all triggered by Ancient Magic. This is a huge storm of extreme and bizarre magic that seems to have created the environment that allowed the soul fragment to survive the Killing Curse and attach to Harry.

We know this is at least partly true, because Avada Kedavra itself was warped - the Potters house was blown apart and Voldemort's body (possibly) with it. This should not have happened, even if Avada Kedavra just bounced back at Voldemort, as per Deathly Hallows. This definitely shows that magic wasn't behaving correctly when Voldemort was killed, and is a major difference between the two attacks - Avada Kedavra usually leaves no soul or soul fragments left in the mortal realm.

The Second Night

If we look at the second night, things are far more straightforward. Voldemort casts the curse and the soul(s) inside Harry are forced on, just as they should be. No unusual functions here - no blasts, nothing other than a flash of green and the victims(s) falling to the ground. The fragment, weak and awful as it is, cannot return from limbo, even if it had the means. It is already gone.

Conclusion

So, to sum up - the fragment couldn't find a new host because it never had a chance to. Avada Kedavra removes souls from the mortal plane, and only the bizarre circumstances of that first night allowed it to survive the Killing Curse and latch onto Harry in the first place.

  • This sounds like a really solid answer - I hope plenty of people get to read it – Au101 Jul 27 '15 at 15:36
2

Only the main soul can exist on it's own, not any of its fragments. Yes, the Horcrux in Harry was not made in the usual way, but he survived the Killing Curse which is also unsual. When the curse back fired he marked Harry by putting part of Voldemort's soul in his body. This was possible because once Voldemort killed his parents, the murder fractured the main soul, which is part of making a Horcrux. Also his soul was already separated 5 times, making it easier for his soul to fracture again.

The fragment is dependent on Harry and like any other Horcrux, it can't change host; only the main soul can do that. It's worth noting that Harry is not a proper Horcrux and the soul piece only serves as a connection between Harry and Voldemort; it is weaker because of this, and can't defend itself or gain strength like the other soul pieces.

  • 1
    Essentially, I think I agree with you. However, it continues to seem very strange to me that the fragment was able to move independently through time and space in the mortal world and latch onto Harry in Godric's Hollow - despite not being transferred by any conscious magic - but never again. It seems like once it's separated, it's got one chance to find a host and once it's found that host, it's stuck to it. Okay. It just seems a little bit like it works that way because the plot demands that it should. I wondered whether Rowling had fleshed this out a bit more somewhere. – Au101 May 27 '15 at 22:55
  • Well Voldermort was acting on a prophecy that he had partial knowledge of. Having part of his soul was how he was marked as his equal. So it happened by the conditions of the prophecy. – Jared May 28 '15 at 3:42
  • 2
    @Au101 I'd say it was able to travel and latch itself onto Harry because it had already been prepared to do so. Voldemort had been meaning to create an horcruxe that night so he must have already cast some enchantments so that when he killed Harry and fractured his soul, he would be able to attach a fragment to some object. So that means that his fragment would have been already "conditionned" to separate itself from him and attach to something else, which would explain the discrepancy between the first and second time... This is just speculation of course, but that's how I make sense of this! – Cartolin Dec 6 '16 at 14:46

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.