35

I know the question of which spell was used has been asked (without really an answer) before. This is not a question of which spell or the series of spells cast. My question is how did Molly have the power to kill Bellatrix.

Harry Potter Book 7: Deathly Hallows:

Bellatrix was still fighting too, fifty yards away from Voldemort, and like her master she dueled three at once: Hermione, Ginny, and Luna, all battling their hardest, but Bellatrix was equal to them, and Harry’s attention was diverted as a Killing Curse shot so close to Ginny that she missed death by an inch—

He changed course, running at Bellatrix rather than Voldemort, but before he had gone a few steps he was knocked sideways.

“NOT MY DAUGHTER, YOU BITCH!”

Mrs. Weasley threw off her cloak as she ran, freeing her arms. Bellatrix spun on the spot, roaring with laughter at the sight of her new challenger.

“OUT OF MY WAY!” shouted Mrs. Weasley to the three girls, and with a swipe of her wand she began to duel. Harry watched with terror and elation as Molly Weasley’s wand slashed and twisted, and Bellatrix Lestrange’s smile faltered and became a snarl. Jets of light flew from both wands, the floor around the witches’ feet became hot and cracked; both women were fighting to kill.

“No!” Mrs. Weasley cried as a few students ran forward, trying to come to her aid. “Get back! Get back! She is mine!” Hundreds of people now lined the walls, watching the two fights, Voldemort and his three opponents, Bellatrix and Molly, and Harry stood, invisible, torn between both, wanting to attack and yet to protect, unable to be sure that he would not hit the innocent.

“What will happen to your children when I’ve killed you?” taunted Bellatrix, as mad as her master, capering as Molly’s curses danced around her. “When Mummy’s gone the same way as Freddie?”

“You — will — never — touch — our — children — again!” screamed Mrs. Weasley. Bellatrix laughed, the same exhilarated laugh her cousin Sirius had given as he toppled backward through the veil, and suddenly Harry knew what was going to happen before it did.

Molly’s curse soared beneath Bellatrix’s outstretched arm and hit her squarely in the chest, directly over her heart.

Bellatrix’s gloating smile froze, her eyes began to bulge: For the tiniest space of time she knew what had happened, and then she toppled, and the watching crowd roared, and Voldemort screamed.

From the quote above we see Bellatrix duelling three witches at the same time and equalling all three.

Bellatrix killed Sirius who was an expert in dueling. Bellatrix defeated Aurors (who are trained specifically to duel death eaters) Frank and Alice Longbottom.

If your answer is that Molly is angry please consider it already states in the above quote:

"...taunted Bellatrix, as mad as her master"

So I'd like some in canon proof that being angrier than someone during a duel overrides their ability and experience.

If for some reason your answer is that Bellatrix is not focused on her new opponent, please consider in the above passage:

Bellatrix spun on the spot, roaring with laughter at the sight of her new challenger.

If it's something about being protective of her children, please explain why this would matter in a dueling situation like this, unlike Lily's which was clearly self sacrifice and explained in great detail.

How could Molly a witch hardly trained in dueling with almost no comparable real life experience in dueling, beat one of the most powerful witches in the series?

  • 25
    "taunted Bellatrix, as mad as her master" - mad here means insane, not angry... – HorusKol May 31 '15 at 0:42
  • 10
    Bellatrix didn't kill Frank and Alice Longbottom, she just tortured them into insanity. It's not specified how she came to have them as prisoners, but it's unlikely it was Bellatrix overpowering both of them in battle. – Kevin May 31 '15 at 0:44
  • 21
    Why do you assume Bellatrix is so powerful? All this passage says is she was "equal" to a 17-year-old and two 16-year-old wizards, none of whom had much experience dueling death-eaters (DA is no substituted for actual battle). Molly, on the other hand, was nearly as old as the three of them combined, and a great deal more experienced, not just from general growing older, but more importantly having been a member of the original Order of the Phoenix, fighting in and surviving the first war. – Kevin May 31 '15 at 1:02
  • 9
    @JMFB no, I'm just stating that Molly isn't as helpless or inept as you clearly think she is. – Kevin May 31 '15 at 2:49
  • 9
    This questions seems to be relying on unchecked assumptions. Molly takes out Beatrix, so clearly she is an able fighter and has had training (and probably plenty of fighting experience). Why would you assume otherwise? Because it does not happen on-screen during the series? Well, she's older than that. – Raphael Nov 6 '15 at 8:20
63

JKR stated during her interview in Carnegie Hall that Molly was simply talented enough and also had the power of love on her side:

Question: How did you decide that Molly Weasley would be the one to finish off Bellatrix?

JKR: I always knew Molly was going to finish her off. I think there was some speculation that Neville would do it, because Neville obviously has a particular reason to hate Bellatrix. So, there were lots of options for Bellatrix, but I never deviated. I wanted it to be Molly, and I wanted it to be Molly for two reasons.

The first reason was I always saw Molly as a very good witch but someone whose light is necessarily hidden under a bushel, because she is in the kitchen a lot and she has had to raise, among others, Fred and George which is like, enough... I wanted Molly to have her moment and to show that because a woman had dedicated herself to her family does not mean that she doesn't have a lot of other talents.

Second reason: It was the meeting of two kinds of - if you call what Bellatrix feels for Voldemort - love, I guess we'll call it love, she has a kind of obsession with him, it's a very sick obsession ... and I wanted to match that kind of obsession with maternal love... the power that you give someone by loving them. So, Molly was really an amazing exemplar of maternal love. ... There was something very satisfying about putting those two women together.

Appearances aside, just because she didn't look or portray herself as an accomplished witch doesn't mean she wasn't one. The series focused on describing the talents and interactions of the new generation, leaving much of the older generation hidden in mystery. Additionally, it often described the power of love as the ultimate magic, which a mother protecting her children as the ultimate example.

  • 23
    @JMFB: No, it wasn't lame writing. The key point is that appearances can be deceiving: Molly was very, very good, but she did not make it her task in life to show how good she was. (Unlike Voldemort, who absolutely had to be seen as the most powerful wizard ever -- the first to conquer death.) Granted, it would have been better writing to somehow foreshadow this high (though hidden) level of skill, but I wouldn't agree that it descended to "lame" writing. – Wayne May 31 '15 at 14:14
  • 21
    @Wayne I seem to remember that there were some exceptional (?) displays of magical multi-tasking around the household. Not flashy, but probably takes as much or more skill than "just" shooting multiple curses towards another person. – Raphael Nov 6 '15 at 8:17
  • 3
    @Raphael: Good point. Which makes me think that Lestrange was powerful to some extent because she absolutely wanted to hurt/kill her opponent. I forget the exact quote, but at one point she tells Harry that the curse he was trying didn't work because you've got to want to hurt the target. So Lestrange was highly effective at dueling because she whole-heartedly wanted it to work and believed it would work. – Wayne Nov 6 '15 at 13:38
  • 15
    Additional point - it seems likely to me that Ginny, being the only girl among her brothers, would be designed to reflect something about their mother - and Ginny (among all the Weasley children) is repeatedly mentioned as being unusually powerful. – DavidS Nov 11 '15 at 17:02
  • 5
    The power of love... is a curious thing. It makes one man weep, and another man sing. – Paul Dec 6 '16 at 13:09
12

It is not any one thing - and you actually pretty much cover all the factors in your question.

Molly is angry at Bellatrix - very specifically so. Her son has just been killed. It's already been shown in the books that strong emotion can lend greater power a spell.

Bellatrix is distracted - she's capering about like a loon (mad here means insane, not angry - angry people don't caper).

Molly is also a fairly accomplished witch - she is a surviving member of the original Order of the Phoenix, when many of them fell to the Deatheaters.

Sirius wasn't quite killed by Bellatrix - he was knocked into the portal and that was what killed him. Doesn't stop Bellatrix from bragging, but also means she wasn't the direct cause of his death.

And Lily didn't fight Voldemort to kill him - she put herself in the way to protect Harry. There's no indication that this was a duel.

So, all of this, all in one moment meant that Molly was able to strike with a killing blow and get past Bellatrix's defences.

  • 9
    and don't forget that we (humans) fight differently when we don't care about our own safety. Molly was out to stop (kill) Bellatrix and didn't care if she died in the process. People fighting in this particular manner are difficult to defend against. – Jim2B May 31 '15 at 1:14
  • 2
    was Molly in the original Order? I thought I remembered a line in one of the last three books when Arthur says to her "You weren't here then, Molly. It was a different time" and goes on to talk about how they were so much more prepared for this second fight with Voldemort than the first one – childcat15 May 31 '15 at 3:41
  • 5
    Do you have any evidence Molly shouldn't have been able to kill Bellatrix? – HorusKol May 31 '15 at 12:16
  • 4
    "Sirius wasn't quite killed by Bellatrix - he was knocked into the portal and that was what killed him. Doesn't stop Bellatrix from bragging, but also means she wasn't the direct cause of his death." Are you saying her Avada Kedavra curse wouldn't have been fatal if the portal hadn't been there? I see no reason to believe that. – GreenMatt Mar 28 '16 at 14:29
  • 3
    @GreenMatt The book doesn't specify the spell Bellatrix hit Sirius with. The previous spell had been a "jet or red light" (p805, Scholastic Edition of OOTP). The film may have had her use the AK, but the book didn't. – pleurocoelus Apr 27 '16 at 22:46
5

It says in the books that Gideon and fabian Prewett fought like heroes and were talented wizards, I would have thought Molly would be the same.and given how gifted and intelligent all her children are, they inherit their skills from someone

  • 1
    Welcome to the site. Opinion based answers aren't really used here. You should back up your answers with facts and references. – Moogle Mar 13 '16 at 11:53
3

In addition to the reasons listed in other answers, Bellatrix did not have her original wand when battling Molly Weasley. As explained in this answer, "[i]t's likely that using a different wand affected her dueling skills to some extent".

3

To clear several things up, because there are a lot of facts being missed or outright ignored. Bellatrix was "a witch with prodigious skill and no conscience" trained by Voldemort himself, his "best lieutenant." She killed several Aurors, injured more, and even escaped Dumbledore himself (in the Death Chamber). Other wizards were "no match" for her. She did not kill Sirius with the Killing Curse - she stunned him and he fell through the veil. Also, Molly was in the newly formed Order of the Phoenix, not the original. Lily and James had "thrice defied" Lord Voldemort, and they were both members of the Order of the Phoenix, so saying that all she ever did was sacrifice herself for Harry is ridiculous. Bellatrix underestimated Molly. Plain and simple. Bellatrix did not consider Molly a serious threat.

  • I edited your answer slightly to emphasise the part that really answers the question - hope you don't mind. Is "She did consider her a serious threat" a typo for "She didn't ..." ? Re your question at the end (although you shouldn't really be posting new questions in answers): maybe Molly hadn't been fighting as hard before and wanted to ensure her arms were free and fully mobile for what was going to be a tough duel. – Rand al'Thor Apr 27 '16 at 20:42
  • 1
    No, my intended answer was that Bellatrix did not consider Molly a serious threat. She was laughing and taunting her, as opposed to focusing on dueling. And good point, as far as perhaps Molly had not been dueling prior to facing Bellatrix. – Aurora Apr 27 '16 at 21:29
2

I agree with the argument that Bellatrix underestimated Molly. Bellatrix is mad, as in bat shit crazy, first of all, and so her judgment and reasoning can easily be questioned. At first she laughed at Molly's attempt to duel with her but grew wary when she was able to dodge and counter her own spells. It was described that the floor beneath the witches' feet became hot and cracked and in this you can see the intensity of their spells. Molly's proficiency in spellcasting can be seen in how she is able to maintain numerous spells in effect around the Weasley household all at the same time. Knowing the antics of her children and being an educated woman herself, she is not defenseless. Add that to how intent, focus, and emotion bolsters spells; she can undoubtedly cast powerful spells in that particular moment. Bellatrix then proceeded to taunt her even further and went into this typical villain speech and did not expect or anticipate a sudden attack from Molly, perhaps thinking that instead of Molly becoming more intent on killing her, she can make her grieve or more angry to the point of distractedness. It backfired, in the end.

0

It seems to me that the power of the witch or wizard comes from the ability to protect an emotion into any given spell. Voldemort is powerful because of his ability to project his hatred into spells, Bellatrix is psychotic and lives in a world of tumultuous emotions. The message here is that love is the most powerful of emotions. It makes one speculate that Ginny, who was extremely powerful even as a little girl, must be a very passionate person. Harry is in for the ride of his life.

protected by Skooba Dec 6 '16 at 13:03

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.