Why did everyone believe that if Sauron reclaimed the One Ring the world would succumb to him, just like that?

Didn't he already fail twice in attempts at world domination, and once even while wearing the One Ring?

  • We also have Gandalf's statement: "The Ringwraiths are deadly enemies, but they are only the shadows yet of the power and terror they would possess if the Ruling Ring was on their master's hand again."
    – user56996
    Commented Dec 9, 2015 at 23:21

2 Answers 2


Elrond and Boromir (at the Council of Elrond) lay out a few good reasons why it's imperative that Sauron's ring is destroyed now;

He'll just keep coming back

His Ring was lost but not unmade. The Dark Tower was broken, but its foundations were not removed; for they were made with the power of the Ring, and while it remains they will endure.

The Alliance that defeated him the last time is now totally untenable

Many Elves and many mighty Men, and many of their friends. had perished in the war. Anárion was slain, and Isildur was slain; and Gil-galad and Elendil were no more. Never again shall there be any such league of Elves and Men; for Men multiply and the Firstborn decrease, and the two kindreds are estranged. And ever since that day the race of Númenor has decayed, and the span of their years has lessened.

Sauron is already more powerful than ever before

We were outnumbered, for Mordor has allied itself with the Easterlings and the cruel Haradrim; but it was not by numbers that we were defeated. A power was there that we have not felt before.

Some said that it could be seen, like a great black horseman, a dark shadow under the moon. Wherever he came a madness filled our foes, but fear fell on our boldest, so that horse and man gave way and fled. Only a remnant of our eastern force came back, destroying the last bridge that still stood amid the ruins of Osgiliath.

  • 6
    Richard, the "great black horseman" was the Witch King, yes?
    – Lexible
    Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 20:38
  • 4
    Indeed it was; I might take issue with the last statement, but I think the first two points are more than enough to provide the answer. Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 20:41
  • @Lexible - Almost certainly. We see the same effect when he turns up later with Grond
    – Valorum
    Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 20:41
  • 8
    In that case you might want we may make the Enemy pay ten times our loss at the passage and yet rue the exchange. For he can afford to lose a host better than we to lose a company. Or you could consider from nearby there marched up an army of Easterlings that had waited for the signal in the shadows of Ered Lithui beyond the further Tower. Down from the hills on either side of the Morannon poured Orcs innumerable. The men of the West were trapped, and soon. all about the grey mounds where they stood, forces ten times and more than ten times their match would ring them in a sea of enemies Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 20:46
  • 1
    @MattGutting - All fine choices.
    – Valorum
    Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 20:55

There's a few reasons why they might be terrified of Sauron getting his Ring back, even though they managed to defeat him the first time. Mostly, it's because they barely managed to win the previous war, and were nowhere near as prepared for another of its caliber. This time around, it's unlikely that they'd be able to defeat a Sauron who had learned from his previous errors and was prepared to correct them.

First, it's important to note that the movie takes some serious liberty here. In the movie, we see the victory over Sauron as almost a fluke: Isildur just happens to get close enough to Sauron's Ring finger to cut it off, effectively killing him. In the source novels, though, it's never really shown how Gil-Galad and Elendil manage to defeat Sauron, but Isildur only cuts off the ring once Sauron is down.

Having said that, there's several things that are different now than during the War of the Last Alliance:

The Last Alliance Can't Exist

The end of the war saw the death of many of the great leaders of both men and Elves, including Gil-Galad, the King of the Noldor Elves. It's generally accepted that Gil-Galad's strength was the only reason the Last Alliance managed to defeat Sauron; but Sauron permanently killed him in the battle. The Noldor Elves were practically extinct by the time of the War of the Ring, with only the population of Rivendell remaining. Elrond was a powerful elf, but he wasn't on the same level as the old High King of the Noldor. Similarly, the other races of Elves had begun leaving Middle Earth, seeing that their time was ending and humanity was taking over.

Similarly, the armies of Men had fractured after Elendil and Isildur's deaths. They were no longer the unified fighting force they had been under the Numenorian kings. When push came to shove, Gondor refused to ask Rohan for aid, and Rohan almost didn't bother to answer.

Lastly, the Dwarves were in pretty bad shape: Durin's clan had been decimated by both Smaug and the Balrog, and were in no real shape to muster an army. (We don't know much about the other 6 clans of dwarves, except that two of them didn't survive the First Age and none of them appear in any of the published works.)

Sauron Has More Resources

In conjunction with the previous bullet point, Sauron now had the ability to field way more soldiers than the Elves and Men. In the Last Alliance, there were hundreds of thousands of Orcs against about the same number of Men, Elves and Dwarves. In the War of the Ring, Sauron fielded almost twice that, to the Men and Elves' less than 125,000.

In addition, by the time of the Council of Elrond, it was known than Sauron now had one of the Istari on his side, while the "good guys" only had Gandalf.

Sauron Knew Better

It's strongly implied that Sauron's defeat only happened because he came out to face Elendil and Gil-Galad himself. Though the Last Alliance had beaten his armies a number of times, the casualties were heavy. The siege of Mordor lasted for seven years, and it seems (from what we know) that Mordor could be largely self-sufficient if needed. Sauron's decision to send out his forces to break the siege, in person, ultimately led to his defeat. In the War of the Ring, Sauron himself never participates in the fighting. Mostly this is because he isn't at full strength yet without the Ring, but there's no reason to think he would make that same mistake a second time.

In conclusion: The Last Alliance of Elves and Men (and Dwarves and Eagles and...) barely managed to fend off Sauron at the height of their respective military powers. Middle Earth was in no condition to do that again if Sauron returned to his full strength.

  • 2
    I smell a question coming on./
    – Valorum
    Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 22:05
  • 1
    @Richard - almost doesn't count, nor does the movie version of events, IMHO
    – Wad Cheber
    Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 22:28
  • 1
    @WadCheber - This strikes me as more telling of Denethor's issues than of Sauron, but still an interesting perspective.
    – Valorum
    Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 22:34
  • 5
    Erm, Gondor refused to call for aid and rohan nearly didnt bother answering? You are confusing the films with the books there.
    – user46509
    Commented Jun 4, 2015 at 8:35
  • 1
    @CarlSixsmith: The Rohan part is true if you consider what Theoden's actions would have been if he hadn't been freed from Grima's/Saruman's influence. In fact, that was the main strategic reason for Saruman being directed to attack Rohan (to make Rohan unable to respond to Gondor). Theoden's "where was Gondor..." speech was purely a movie invention though (and never made sense even in the films, since it was Theoden's, and not Gondor's, inaction that was responsible for Rohan falling under Saruman). Commented Jun 4, 2015 at 13:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.