10

In The Hobbit, the heroes shelter from a storm in the mountains and see a group of stone-giants throwing boulders at each other.

The Stone-giants were out, and were hurling rocks at one another for a game, and catching them, and tossing them down into the darkness where they smashed among the trees far below, or splintered into little bits with a bang.
-The Hobbit, Chapter 4: "Over Hill and Under Hill"

Later, Gandalf considers asking a stone-giant to block up the entrance to the Goblin Town (which suggests that at least some stone-giants are relatively nice guys).

"I must see if I can't find a more or less decent giant to block it up again," said Gandalf, "or soon there will be no getting over the mountain at all."
-The Hobbit, Chapter 6: "Out of the Frying-Pan into the Fire"

But as far as I know, stone-giants don't appear in Tolkien's writing after this. They would certainly be as interesting as the Ents, or at least nearly as interesting, so I am wondering why he didn't do more with them.

Did Tolkien ever discuss why stone-giants don't play a bigger role in his stories?

  • 4
    Did you know that the Ents were originally giants in early manuscripts of The Lord of the Rings? (In fact ent is Old English for "giant".) I think perhaps Tolkien associated his earlier stone-giants with the deliberately childish tone he disliked about The Hobbit - "we shall be picked up by some giant and kicked sky-high for a football." – Matt Gutting Jun 4 '15 at 19:27
  • 1
    From the Wikia: "In a letter by Tolkien, it was mentioned that a Giant was to be included in the Lord of the Rings. Further information discussed in the History of Middle-earth series confirms that the giant later became the basis for Treebeard." Someone like Jason Baker or @MattGutting with a comprehensive knowledge of the more obscure Tolkien lore will probably be able to make a good answer out of this... – Rand al'Thor Jun 4 '15 at 19:33
  • 1
    There are lots of mentions of giants in Tolkien's early drafts; early versions of The Silmarillion list giants among the servants of Melko, and of Treebeard flip-flopped between a good and evil giant before eventually becoming a tree-giant (and finally Ent). However, I'm not having much luck finding Tolkien's reasons for abandoning the idea – Jason Baker Jun 4 '15 at 19:39
  • 2
    Relevant. Also, maybe the Stone Giants were actually a kind of Troll (hill trolls of Gorgoroth, anyone?) – Rand al'Thor Jun 4 '15 at 19:42
  • 1
    @randal'thor - I doubt it. Gandalf wouldn't expect to find "more or less decent" trolls. – Wad Cheber Jun 4 '15 at 19:47
3

I think the main factor is that stone giants don't fit into Tolkien's Middle-Earth legendarium very well. All other beings have an explained origin, including the Ents, but stone giants just seem like a generic fairytale construct.

  • 1
    Based on The Hobbit, you could say the same thing about almost any being in Tolkien's world- elves, goblins, Eagles, wizards, whatever. He could have filled in the blanks regarding stone-Giants later, like he did with everything else. – Wad Cheber Jun 5 '15 at 23:47
  • 1
    Well, here were are talking about Middle-Earth legendarium on the whole, and the Hobbit had to be merged with it. Elves, goblins, and wizards all have their specific origin in 'The Silmarillion'; stone giants do not. – Maksim Jun 6 '15 at 20:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.