I've been informed by those who know much more about Harry Potter than I that Hogwarts is protected with a Disillusionment Charm so all muggles will see is ruins with a "Danger: Keep out!" sign around them. (Apparently this was in one of the first three books, but I'm not sure where it was.)

My first thought was, "Well, a danger sign would encourage some muggles to investigate!" Which leads to what I think is an obvious question: Will a disillusionment charm on a place like that still work when a person is real close to the location? Will it work from inside the location?

For example, if a curious muggle made it to the gates of Hogwarts and started walking around inside, would they still see it as abandon and in ruins, or once they entered, would they see it as it is?

  • I believe it would have the same effect as the Leaky Couldron; Muggles walk by it (very close) but cannot see it. This is because it is unplottable.
    – Möoz
    Commented Apr 11, 2014 at 2:33

5 Answers 5


‘It’s bewitched,’ said Hermione. ‘If a Muggle looks at it, all they see is a mouldering old ruin with a sign over the entrance saying DANGER, DO NOT ENTER, UNSAFE.’

‘So Durmstrang’ll just look like a ruin to an outsider, too?’

‘Maybe,’ said Hermione, shrugging, ‘or it might have Muggle-Repelling Charms on it, like the World Cup Stadium. And to keep foreign wizards from finding it, they’ll have made it Unplottable –’

‘Come again?’

‘Well, you can enchant a building so it’s impossible to plot on a map, can’t you?’

‘Er ... if you say so,’ said Harry.

Goblet of Fire - Page 148 - UK Hardcover

I think that Muggle-Repelling charms make the most sense. The trio uses them to protect themselves while they're on the run in Deathly Hallows, as well. "Salvio Hexia... Protego Totalum... Repello Muggletum... Muffliato..."

In general, I don't think there is a specific distance at which Disillusionment Charms fail, but a witch or wizard could use Homenum Revelio to see if there are people around who are under a Disillusionment Charm (which is the charm used by Dumbledore to become invisible) I believe Hogsmeade is one of the few all-wizarding towns and it's near Hogwarts; I doubt a lot of Muggles are in the vicinity of Hogwarts to begin with. But I'm guessing that any Muggle who finds their way to Hogwarts would not be able to approach it.

  • But without repelling charms, with just disillusionment charms, would someone still see ruins if they were in that area?
    – Tango
    Commented Jan 23, 2012 at 0:09
  • 5
    A Muggle, I think not. There isn't an example of a Muggle discovering anything or anyone under a Disillusion Charm in the seven books. No Muggle stumbles into Grimmauld Place or the tent the trio uses in book seven. Voldemort casts a Disillusion Charm on himself and cannot see his body; if Voldemort cannot see through a Disillusion Charm at that close of a range (and it doesn't get much closer than the self!), I don't think Muggles, who have no magical intuition or ability, would be able to see through a Disillusion Charm, no matter how close they were to the person/object in question. Commented Jan 23, 2012 at 1:17
  • @Slytherincess Otoh there is one case where a Squib was in Hogwarts... pottermore.com/writing-by-jk-rowling/scottish-rugby
    – Pryftan
    Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 21:22

Well, not only would the Muggles see the sign (which would deter only those who can read, and not even all of those), but there is probably some kind of Jedi mind trick that makes them think that there is no reason to go there. I'm sure that whatever roads lead to Hogsmeade village have a charm that makes Muggles think they've gone the wrong way, which will prompt them to turn about.

We do know that Myrtle's parents (who are Muggles) visited the school after Myrtle's death, so there is certainly some means of getting a Muggle past the anti-Muggle charms.

  • but there is probably some kind of Jedi mind trick that makes them think that there is no reason to go there Good point. Wasn't something like this done at least in one occasion where they immediately thought they had something important come up? Maybe it was on Pottermore; I don't know, but I’m pretty sure that it happened and if nothing else it is possible.
    – Pryftan
    Commented Feb 12, 2019 at 23:30

In the film Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore Muggle Jacob Kowalski wanders around Hogwarts freely. He seems have no issues seeing the castle and the whimsical magic contained within.

enter image description here

It's possible, however, that he's been made some sort of exception from the usual Muggle-repelling charms that keep his sort outside and unaware.


The disillusionment charm is used in the creation of Invisibility cloaks.

Will a disillusionment charm on a place like that still work when a person is real close to the location?

People often get up close and personal to Harry when he is in his cloak, but besides bumping into him, they don't know he's there. I can't see why it would be different on a building.

Will it work from inside the location?

Yes, Harry can see out of the cloak, so I can't see why a building wide equivalent wouldn't work the same.

  • 2
    Harry's cloak (probably) wasn't a disillusionment-charm cloak, Xenophilius Lovegood says they wear off eventually. (It could be a really good one that doesn't wear off, potentially).
    – Kevin
    Commented Jan 23, 2012 at 3:30

No, we have first point of view of characters who have the spells in himself.

Harry in chapter 3 of Order of Phoenix sees himself with the colour and the texture of near thing. Voldemort on the other hand uses the spell in Deathly Hallows in chapter 24 and he can´t see anything. Dumbledore also uses the spell in Philosopher stone chapter 12 and Harry don´t see anything until Dumbledore lift the spell.

Based on that a powerful wizard can make something practically invisible, a less powerful wizard maybe if you are very near you could see a silhouette like when octopus camouflages themselves.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.