I want to read Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles, but I was told I shouldn't read the first one. I was told that the second one is better. So, do you have to read them in order, or are they separate stories?
No its not necessary to read the books in chronological order, but easier because certain books actually happen BEFORE others. However, Anne Rice herself somewhat cancels the first book out by having Lestat refer to Louis as a liar and say in the second book that most of what Louis says is misinformation due to his lack of telepathic ability or lies and his account is the true account and what he says is the Real truth...only the happiness and love they shared was true.
All I can say is read them in order. If you omit one I hire Interview with the Vampire I would say. I started Queen of the Damned twice. Once, it took like 12 pages to describe one kill. Though that’s cool, I was like”get on with the story”. Second was two Xmas’ ago. I was given a first edition (w/sleeve) in mint condition. When my girlfriend told me how little she had paid ($3-4), I figured ‘damn. Whoever sold it didn’t know what they had. Once I get the paperback I’ll read it. As far as skipping books in a series. Not a good idea. If you read them out of order, I’d read Interview with the Vampire before The Tale of the Body Thief. I’m reading Witching Hour now, so I’m not very in touch with Lestat stories at the moment.