In universe, why wouldn't Skynet use biologic/nanotec infiltrators (instead of Schwarzenegger)/subtle WMD to abolish mankind? Surely it would mean they'd win before we knew we were at war.

1 Answer 1


Two main reasons:

1) Skynet needs human beings to survive until Judgment Day. If it sends an engineered virus back to the 1980s and wipes out humanity, at that point Skynet itself has not been built, so Skynet will never exist.

2) Sending one or more Terminators back in time was a desperate, last-ditch move by Skynet. It didn't have much time to prepare.

The second point is strongly implied by Reese's dialogue with Silberman:

SILBERMAN: Why this elaborate scheme with the Terminator?

REESE: It had no choice. Their defense grid was smashed. We'd won. Taking out Connor then would make no difference. Skynet had to wipe out his entire existence!

SILBERMAN: Is that when you captured the lab complex and found the, uh, what was it called... the time displacement equipment?

REESE: That's right. The Terminator had already gone through. Connor sent me to intercept him and they blew the whole place.

SILBERMAN: Well, how are you supposed to get back?

REESE: I can't. Nobody goes home. Nobody else comes through. It's just him - and me.

  • Thanks, but that doesn't really answer my question.Terminators were post Judgement Day, so why go through the exercise of creating terminators? If Skynet's purpose is to destroy humanity, then it could have gone the disease spreading nanobot route instead. Think how vulnerable humanity would be if right after a Nuclear strike, the survivors had to deal with Ebola,Hanta, X-viruses. It would be easier to do and harder to defend against, which would obviate the need for the whole time travel last ditch effort.
    – bob
    Aug 11, 2015 at 17:54
  • 1
    In that case, you should clarify the question -- it doesn't mention that you're talking about after Judgment Day. I also have an answer in mind for your revised question but will wait until after you have edited. :-) Aug 12, 2015 at 10:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.