20

We all remember the scene where Marty is playing the guitar and then starts to have difficulty as his hand fades. That got me to thinking: the photograph of the three kids showed that certain parts of them would fade rather than them fading a a whole generally.

Photograph

You will note in the above photograph that Dave's head fades.

My question then is as the chance of Loraine and George getting married and having kids faded (pun intended), why did their children in the photograph not fade as a whole - why did some parts fade before others?

Disambiguation: I am not asking why Marty was the last child to fade. I am asking about why the McFly children began to fade out body-part by body-part, not the order in which the individual children disappear. Without further details, the answer to that other question cannot fully address what I am inquiring about!

  • 5
    Good question, +1. Looking forward to seeing an answer (if any) for this. In the meantime, enjoy this comic. – user35594 Aug 17 '15 at 0:10
  • 2
    From speculation, I can't think of any reason that would explain why certain body parts faded before others. The way I see it is that the original timeline of 1955 is shifting slightly due to the actions of future Marty. This would determine what exists/doesn't exist in the future where future Marty came from. I think the producers wanted to add a certain gripping moment by adding a fade effect to mimic a time limit. Personally I think it would make more sense to make the kids transparent as a whole, over time, instead of fading each body part completely. Hope there's an answer to this! – user35594 Aug 17 '15 at 0:40
  • 2
    @user35594 exactly my thoughts! – Often Right Aug 17 '15 at 0:47
  • 2
    @N_Soong : I guess you made that question to the edit on a mobile? I fixed it up a bit -- hope that's okay. :-) – Praxis Aug 17 '15 at 16:05
  • 3
    Also, this is a wholly distinct question from the Marty-fading-out-last question. Some information from that question is relevant here, but that info cannot answer the present question without further detail and justification. I do not believe the current question should be closed. – Praxis Aug 17 '15 at 16:06
19

Timeline cascade and fetal organ development

In your earlier question,

Why was Marty the last child to fade out?

the accepted answer posits:

It seems that the changes in the timeline cascade forward, affecting temporally displaced facts in order of how far removed they are from the moment of distortion. Marty faded last because his birthday is the furthest away.

Now consider this helpful information on fetal development from the Mayo Clinic. Organs begin to form at Week 5, in a particular order:

Week 5

Fetal development three weeks after conception The fifth week of pregnancy, or the third week after conception, marks the beginning of the embryonic period. This is when the baby's brain, spinal cord, heart and other organs begin to form.

Week 6

Fetal development four weeks after conception Growth is rapid this week. Just four weeks after conception, the neural tube along your baby's back is closing and your baby's heart is pumping blood.

Basic facial features will begin to appear, including passageways that will make up the inner ears and arches that will contribute to the jaw. Your baby's body begins to take on a C-shaped curvature. Small buds will soon become arms and legs.

Week 7

Seven weeks into your pregnancy, or five weeks after conception, your baby's brain and face are rapidly developing. Tiny nostrils become visible, and the eye lenses begin to form. The arm buds that sprouted last week now take on the shape of paddles.

Applying the logic of the accepted answer for the question referenced above to Dave's head disappearing first, it could very well be that organs and body parts disappear in the order of "how far removed they are from the moment of distortion".

The heart is one of the first organs to appear, and so it may have actually disappeared before the head! The brain and arm buds / "paddle" hands form next, which could be why Dave's head disappears before the rest of his body and why Marty's hands start to disappear while he plays the guitar.

  • 1
    Actually makes sense! I feel sorry for the headless Dave though... ;) – Often Right Aug 17 '15 at 2:43
  • 3
    @N_Soong : Headless and heartless, perhaps! ;-) – Praxis Aug 17 '15 at 2:49
  • By this logic, his hair would be one of the last things to disappear, but the Doc remarked that it was missing earlier in the film when he claimed the photo was shopped. – user867 Aug 17 '15 at 4:16
  • 2
    Interesting answer, but as good as we're probably gonna get. I don't think BTF was that concerned about canon, inconsistencies, etc. It's more of a kids/family movie for a general audience, not really a sci/fi only crowd, which is really who used to go to sci/fi movies back then. It's also not a weekly TV show so again, no need to clarify anything. So this seems pretty good as usual Praxis. I can't think of any other reason why they'd fade like that. +1 – JMFB Aug 17 '15 at 4:31
  • 6
    @user867 : Let's not split hairs. ;-) – Praxis Aug 17 '15 at 4:41
6

That's because George (or Loraine) marrying someone else would not prevent him having ANY children, but just having THAT specific child.

Say George married "Mary". He could still have three children, but they would not be the same, because they are a combination of the parents' DNA: it would be impossible for George and Mary's child to look like Dave.

The picture shows the "possible" future: could Dave be the son of George and a woman other than Loraine? No -> The picture cannot show Dave's face. Could George have three children with any woman? Yes -> The picture still shows three children but the face is undefined yet.

Think of the picture of the tombstone: when events change the tombstone doesn't disappear, just the inscription, because it was still possible that it would be used for someone. As soon as this is determined the picture changes again.

Marty is a weird case, because he starts disappearing from the hands instead of the head. Maybe he inherited the aspect from George, but took the music talent from his mom...

  • 4
    This still doesn't explain why they began fading body part by body part though! – Often Right Aug 17 '15 at 10:09
  • Because the rest of the body was still "possible". A tall guy would still be a possible child of George, but not with Dave's face. The weird case is Martin, because he starts disappearing from the hands. – algiogia Aug 17 '15 at 10:40
  • Could the downvoters please comment? – algiogia Aug 18 '15 at 8:07
  • The problem with this argument is that why would Dave's face fade but not the other children's? If it was based on who George was going to marry, then wouldn't the other childrens' face have also faded? – Often Right Aug 18 '15 at 8:24
  • @N_Soong maybe it was too late to have a "Dave" but it was still possible that Loraine end up with George later and have the other two. – algiogia Aug 18 '15 at 9:28

protected by Often Right Aug 18 '15 at 7:57

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.