19

In Harry Potter, we know ghosts became ghosts when they are too afraid of death to go on - I thought about it and I'm quite certain they all go to their own version of Harry's King's Cross and become ghosts when they return as Harry did. So can they return there? Once they've been a ghost long enough that they no longer fear death, can they move on?

  • As far as I can tell, there's no answer in canon or JKR stuff. – DVK-on-Ahch-To Jan 30 '12 at 17:38
13

According to the wiki, they can't. In the article on History of Magic (the Hogwarts class), there's a statement under the Behind the Scenes heading about Cuthbert Binns:

As Binns became a ghost, he can no longer move beyond the veil, and will remain earthbound for all eternity. This means that unless he resigned or was sacked, he would be the History of Magic teacher forever. This is probably the reason that the school has not sacked him thus far, despite his dreadful teaching technique.

This statement is repeated, with the same meaning but not as long in the article on Binns. They do not, however, cite a source for this -- whether it was in books or Word of God.

The same information is given on the wiki article on ghosts:

As ghosts are imprints of souls of the said deceased wizards and witches, they are unable to move beyond the veil, and are forever trapped in the world of living as intangible beings. Due to this, few would choose this path. Depending on the conditions of the person's soul, they may not be able to return, as Tom Riddle's heavily damaged soul is trapped in limbo for eternity and cannot become a ghost.

Again, no citation in the wiki for the actual source.

  • 5
    This whole "imprints of souls" things makes it more confusing. Aren't magical paintings a sort of imprint too? Make it seems like maybe the real soul actually did cross through the veil, leaving behind a copy (or the part that was afraid to cross). – user11521 May 30 '14 at 21:22
  • 1
    That's a different kind of magic. Dumbledore is gone, but his portrait remains behind to assist future Hogworts heads. And Dumbledore did move on. Sir Nicholas explained it: He feared death, therefore choosing a poor imitation of life. – Jinoshio Mar 27 '16 at 7:53
5

Recall what Moaning Myrtle says in CS chapter 16.

‘My whole body sort of seized up, and then I was floating away…’ […] ‘And then I came back again. I was determined to haunt Olive Hornby, you see. Oh, she was sorry she'd ever laughed at my glasses.’

If haunting Olive Hornby was the reason Myrtle returned as a ghost, then that purpose is served now. Myrtle remains in Hogwarts whereas Hornby isn't there, so it's very likely that Olive has either died or Myrtle has given up on haunting her.

In any case, Myrtle seems to have no reason to remain in this world anymore. She seems to be generally unhappy and we see her do nothing but dwell her time, living in the bathroom and occasionally spying on boys in other bathrooms (see GF chapter 25). If she knew a way to go on, I'm sure she would.

  • 1
    It's all down to choices. You either go or you don't. You are either for or against. You can't have it both ways. – Jinoshio Mar 27 '16 at 7:55
2

According to JKR, Ghosts are transparent, moving, talking and thinking versions of wizards and witches who wished, for whatever reason, to remain on earth. (TOBTB - page 79 - UK Edition). I think it's a little different for ghosts than it was for Harry. Harry did not fear death -- in fact he braved it willingly. Nearly Headless Nick explains that ghosts are people who fear death:

‘I was afraid of death,’ said Nick softly. ‘I chose to remain behind. I sometimes wonder whether I oughtn’t to have ... well, that is neither here nor there ... in fact, I am neither here nor there ...’ He gave a small sad chuckle. ‘I know nothing of the secrets of death, Harry, for I chose my feeble imitation of life instead. I believe learned wizards study the matter in the Department of Mysteries –’

‘Don’t talk to me about that place!’ said Harry fiercely.

‘I am sorry not to have been more help,’ said Nick gently. ‘Well ... well, do excuse me ... the feast, you know ...’

Order of the Phoenix - chapter 38 - The Second War Begins

I can't find an instance in canon that indicates ghosts can move forward once they've died and come back, nor could I find a quote from JKR indicating this. A quote may well exist, but I wasn't able to find it (albeit in a fairly cursory search). Perhaps someone else will better be able to provide a quote, but as it is right now I don't believe there is canon evidence to support the idea that ghosts can move on. Some souls get trapped in limbo, such as Voldemort's, neither able to go back (like Harry did) or move on.

0

It seems quite unlikely that they could. There are a few ghosts who seem to be more than willing to move on, but are stuck. If they could move on, they would.

0

I personally feel that for a ghost to move on it would require something unethical. To have remained behind after death, I think they would have had to sever their souls from their bodies while alive, and that to die they would have to take over someone else's body and die in that. Hence why none seem to have done it.

  • 2
    Are there any particular snippets of text, or writings by JKR which lead you to this belief? – Edlothiad Aug 27 '18 at 7:10
-1

Ghosts cannot move on. When they enter limbo they're faced with both the oppertunity to move on to a land that no one knows or to return to earth for certain reasons like unfinished business e.g Myrtle wanted to haunt the girl who laughed at her apperance. When the person dies, they go to limbo. It is a world inside their head where they get time to make the decision. Each persons version of limbo is completely different depending on the lives they led. But for people who have tampered with their souls such as Voldemort or Herpo the foul who split their souls into 7 and 1 horcrux(es). They will have to stay in limbo for eternity and live in pain for the suffering they have caused to their souls and the people they killed to make the horcruxes

  • 1
    Is the information u've provided about limbo from any place in canon? – Shisa Jul 24 '14 at 13:18
  • I believe it to be on the Harry Potter Wikia page entitled 'Limbo' if I'm not mistaken @Shisa – liam tomkins Jul 29 '14 at 1:15
  • 1
    Thanks, Liam. However, wiki seems to say that a) it may be possible that ghosts decide in limbo and b) we don't know if everyone goes through limbo after they die. Also, generally, since wiki is editable by anyone, things given in wiki should be taken with a pinch of salt, if unsourced, even if wiki does state something is definitely true (which it doesn't in this case) – Shisa Jul 29 '14 at 14:08
  • I may be wrong but didn't dumbledore state when harry went to limbo after being killed by voldemort that everyone has the choice to stay or go on? – liam tomkins Jul 29 '14 at 19:56
-2

Many fandoms say that they cant and some ghosts like Moaning Myrtle, Nearly headless nick and others never moved on. And it's stated that a soul chooses to return out of fear or unfinished business. I think that if a soul doesn't fear death but got a reasonable need to return to something then they may be granted the gift of moving on. Because Moaning Myrtle wanted to take revenge on a school bully and Nick was just scared of death. All crappy reasons. However, say if a soul chooses to come back to guide or protect a loved one or to aid someone then I think after the death of their loved one the ghost may be able to move on as their need will be completed. Like its just an example, and a theory.

  • Is there any basis for this in the Potterverse? – Edlothiad Nov 8 '17 at 17:35
-3

When dealing with a universe where magic is possible, a ghost can do whatever the author wants. So, if J. K. wants a ghost to move on, he/she will.

  • Hi. "because it's magic" is a common meme on this site, but tends not to work well as an answer in itself. Any supporting information or citations that you can provide in support of your answer will help improve it. For instance, we can ask, does the author's world have an internal consistency regarding ghosts? If not, why not? If so, what does that tell us? – The Giant of Lannister Mar 27 '16 at 8:18
-5

I think there would be some 'condition' or extremely complex procedure that could probably allow ghosts to move 'on' into the other world. Given that even Voldemort himself had the opportunity to recover his soul from the stunted, mangled, divided soul it had become by undergoing intense remorse, then surely, SURELY, ghosts aren't surely beings who have done something so terrible that they don't deserve a second chance/a chance to move 'on'.

Well, perhaps if following Christianity, perhaps Christ could bless ghosts to move on. Or perhaps, an act of sacrifice or an act of extreme generosity could allow ghosts to move on. Given that wizards have succeeded in creating the elixir of immortality, like Nicholas Flamel, or horcruxes, or even the ressurection stone, various kinds magic that tamper with the fundamental laws of life and death, surely there would be some kind of magic that allow ghosts to move on, eventually.

  • At the end of Order of the Phoenix, Harry talks to Sir Nicholas, in hopes that Sirius will return as a ghost. Sir Nicholas tells Harry outright that he cannot ever move on; he will always be a ghost. Regarding remorse and Voldemort, Hermione notes to Ron and Harry in Deathly Hallows that the process of mending the soul with remorse is so excruciating that it is most often fatal. – Slytherincess May 17 '12 at 20:01
  • Well I just felt it was a bit unfair, that even Voldemort has a chance to avoid being stuck in limbo if he sought remorse, no matter how difficult, but a good person/ghost like Sir Nicholas will never have any chance again to move on into the dead. Don't you think? – Manik Sethisuwan May 18 '12 at 9:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.