Timeline for Why did Stannis join the rebellion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2015 at 1:00 | comment | added | curiousdannii | Stannis didn't knowingly kill his brother (though he was happy for him to die.) | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 22:32 | vote | accept | EdmundYeung99 | ||
| Sep 22, 2015 at 21:32 | answer | added | TenthJustice | timeline score: 26 | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:48 | answer | added | onewho | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:48 | comment | added | KutuluMike | @Himarm Rhaegar | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:48 | comment | added | EdmundYeung99 | the Mad King had a reason for killing, he killed those he viewed as traitors, e.g. Brandon Stark | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:47 | answer | added | KutuluMike | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:44 | comment | added | Himarm | no, as a king you can kill your brother, if your brother broke the rules, which he did... killing for no reason isnt allowed, killing after a crime is commited. | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:43 | comment | added | EdmundYeung99 | @Himarm but if he killed his brother that is breaking the rules too? according to your logic | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:40 | comment | added | Himarm | stannis is a stickler for the rules, which is why he killed his brother, because by rights it was stannis who should be king according to the rules. However, as a king you have to follow rules as well, and when the Mad King killed off multiple high lords for no reason, that's typically construed as breaking the rules a king has to follow.He probably would have consented for Ragdar to be king, had Radgar opposed his father. | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:36 | |||||
| Sep 22, 2015 at 20:33 | history | asked | EdmundYeung99 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |