Timeline for Which ship has the most prolific "recurring" role in Star Trek?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
38 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2023 at 18:39 | comment | added | Spencer | Aren't all Borg cubes the same one? | |
| Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 14:58 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | @Praxis: No problem. | |
| Sep 1, 2016 at 18:44 | history | edited | Praxis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 60 characters in body
|
| Sep 1, 2016 at 18:43 | comment | added | Praxis | @ThePopMachine : You updated the question with the Kirk on the wall analogy, but you should remove the bit about it not necessarily being the Stargazer. Rick Sternbach already confirmed it is and you and I already discussed this. | |
| Sep 1, 2016 at 14:46 | history | edited | ThePopMachine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 16, 2015 at 4:17 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | @thomas, yes, it's not important to know the name of the ship if we know it's the same ship. | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 2:08 | comment | added | 1252748 | Are ships the official designations of which are unknown but are certainly the same ship admissible? I feel that the ST:ENT's "Xindi weapon" (third, final iteration), though not known by its official name, owns the most mentions/views of the same vessel, giving it the unequivocal most appearances. It was a ship (self propelled, had a crew), and was I think in 15+- eps of ENT. May I submit this as an answer?; the question stands as "what ship appears..", not "which ship we know the official name of appears.." Anyway, if isn't right—in my view—it belongs here with the contenders. Thanks! | |
| Oct 6, 2015 at 22:10 | history | edited | ThePopMachine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1447 characters in body
|
| S Oct 4, 2015 at 9:28 | history | suggested | Scimonster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add missing word
|
| Oct 4, 2015 at 8:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 4, 2015 at 9:28 | |||||
| Oct 3, 2015 at 21:44 | answer | added | Caleb Hines | timeline score: 15 | |
| Oct 3, 2015 at 3:15 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | @user14111, okay, well I would have thought you could get it from the context or from googling it. "Prolific" means abundant or plentiful. Technically, I've used it pretty imprecisely here, which is what I thought you were calling me out on. I couldn't think of a better single-word choice at the time. | |
| Oct 3, 2015 at 0:27 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | @user14111: read the question text for a full explanation of the question. That's what it's for | |
| Oct 2, 2015 at 23:00 | comment | added | user14111 | What does the word "prolific" mean in the title of your question? | |
| Oct 2, 2015 at 9:04 | comment | added | user001 | @ThePopMachine USS Intrepid (NCC-38907) • USS Intrepid (NCC-74600) Two Intrepid named ships (one that rescued Worf and one which Geordi was in competition with). One would also assume that there is an NX Intrepid for the class of ship for Voyager. That's two ships of the same name and common sense indicates that there was a third. Without ship registry number, visuals or a class designation how are you sure... | |
| Oct 2, 2015 at 7:38 | comment | added | Raphael | Aren't all Borg cubes essentially the same thing? ;) | |
| Oct 2, 2015 at 0:54 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/649749143838138368 | ||
| Oct 1, 2015 at 21:05 | comment | added | Schwern | Are we counting off screen things like scene deceptions in official scripts, close ups of production models, and statements from prominent production staff? Or are the episodes to be treated as "historical documents"? | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 19:11 | answer | added | Praxis | timeline score: 55 | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 19:05 | answer | added | Valorum | timeline score: 82 | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 18:55 | answer | added | Schwern | timeline score: 51 | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 18:50 | comment | added | Praxis | There's some starship with blow-dryers for nacelles that appears in the two of the films. Does that count? :-) | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 17:53 | history | edited | ThePopMachine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 1, 2015 at 17:24 | answer | added | ThePopMachine | timeline score: 14 | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 16:48 | history | edited | ThePopMachine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 66 characters in body
|
| Oct 1, 2015 at 16:25 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | @user001: Because you apply some reasonable common sense. How do you know it's the same Adm. Nechayev whenever someone mentions her? If there's a mention two years apart, and there's no indication the ship was destroyed and a new ship christened in that timeframe, then you reasonably assume it is the same ship. | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 16:24 | comment | added | Mr Lister | @ThePopMachine Ahhh, I hadn't made that distinction between main roles and recurring roles. Yes, it's clear now. | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 16:15 | comment | added | user001 | How do we know that ships mentioned in dialogue are the same ship? | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 16:14 | answer | added | kl78 | timeline score: 35 | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:55 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | @MrLister: Heh, I suppose you could make that argument, but the concept is that just like we have main cast and recurring roles for actors, there's a notion of recurring roles for ships. | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:53 | history | edited | ThePopMachine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:53 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | @Himarm: No, technically there are not ships, even though they may have some propulsion. And that's against the intent anyhow. Furthermore, it should be clear that DS9 is not valid because it is not "recurring", it is main cast, like Enterprises and Voyager. I will edit to remove the debate. | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:49 | comment | added | Himarm | also if you dont tag it technically ds9 and the earth space dock are ships, though they lack warp. | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:49 | answer | added | merelyMark | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:45 | history | edited | ThePopMachine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:26 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | Countdown to people not reading the text and answering "Enterprise" in 3. 2. 1.... | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:25 | history | asked | ThePopMachine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |