Timeline for Why bother with the planet at the event horizon?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2018 at 11:04 | vote | accept | Hothie | ||
| Mar 2, 2018 at 9:15 | comment | added | bdecaf | I have the impression there was a more involved plot drafted for the planet. There would have been interesting options: Settlers, supplies and help sent there would arrive from the colonists viewpoint rapidly. Or it could be used as time capsule - say if earth or some other planet would be terraformed the settlers could just stay a few days on Miller's planet and then colonise the "new" planet. | |
| Mar 2, 2018 at 0:24 | comment | added | Mithoron | scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/80245/… and scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/93369/… point how bad idea and incredible stretch was adding such a planet to the movie. Pretty much only to make them go close to BH and show off some extreme gravitational effects. | |
| Mar 1, 2018 at 16:50 | answer | added | Valorum | timeline score: 10 | |
| Mar 1, 2018 at 16:49 | comment | added | Gallifreyan | See scifi.stackexchange.com/q/72502/70236. Doesn't answer your question, imo, but still a few answers there | |
| Mar 1, 2018 at 16:46 | history | edited | Shreedhar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar fix and spell check
|
| Mar 1, 2018 at 16:28 | history | asked | Hothie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |