Timeline for How 'canon' is the Star Trek Online MMO?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 4, 2016 at 19:21 | history | suggested | Ellesedil | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Disney now controls what's canon for Star Wars
|
| Mar 4, 2016 at 19:10 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 4, 2016 at 19:21 | |||||
| Jan 15, 2016 at 10:10 | comment | added | Broklynite | Whoa whoa whoa, the cartoon is considered canon? So now canonically the Kzin are in the Star Trek universe? | |
| Mar 6, 2013 at 9:19 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jan 29, 2013 at 17:48 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | @MattPeterson - SW canon is pretty simple: it's a database of facts, with canon level; facts from movies have "G" level, facts from TV show "T" level, facts from all other licensed EU work "C" level, facts from works (like RPGs) which aren't mainline C-level EU, but don't contradict main canon are "S" level; facts that contradict higher level canon are "N" level. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_canon#The_Holocron | |
| Jan 29, 2013 at 17:11 | comment | added | Matt Peterson | +1 for a succinct answer. I'm still mystified as to why there is so much confusion about ST canon. True, the Powers that Be might not have descended from on high to bestow upon us an "official" canon, but one has been accepted by the community for so long that it might as well be a standard. I'm also not sure why because Star Trek's canon is (to me, at least) so simple it is therefore a "joke". I guess it is relative: to me (as someone who isn't deeply into Star Wars fandom), Star Wars canon is a complete mystery. | |
| Jan 29, 2013 at 4:01 | comment | added | Izkata | To be more specific about TAS, it's generally considered canon except where it conflicts with a live-action series/movie (I haven't seen it, so I don't know how often that happens). The Original Series is even more complicated... | |
| S Jan 28, 2013 at 20:14 | history | suggested | coleopterist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo fixed
|
| Jan 28, 2013 at 20:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 28, 2013 at 20:14 | |||||
| Jan 28, 2013 at 18:25 | comment | added | user1027 | Whoops, I meant the StarTrek.com FAQ that defined canon. It's linked as a reference by the Memory Alpha page you link. | |
| Jan 28, 2013 at 18:21 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | @Keen - do you mean "Memory Alpha" by "that page"? If so, I am not convinced either way - MA is a Wiki, so it in itself should NOT be considered the ultimate arbiter of canonicity, especially merely by absence. | |
| Jan 28, 2013 at 18:12 | comment | added | user1027 | Something to note is that the archived versions of that page from late 2009 and early 2010 have no mention of STO. That was the period around the game's release, so you'd expect it to be incorporated around then into the entry if it was canon. | |
| Jan 28, 2013 at 18:06 | history | answered | DVK-on-Ahch-To | CC BY-SA 3.0 |