6

SPOILERS INBOUND

I have only just started rereading Stephen King's "IT" for the umpteenth time, but there's a small something that keeps bothering me that is pertinent to the creature - IT itself.

We eventually learn that It is female and is pregnant. What has bothered me...

  1. How did It become pregnant? Asexual reproduction?

  2. If it did reproduce asexually, then it could have sooner, yes? So then didn't it attempt to procreate sooner, before the Losers' Club could destroy It's offspring? Talk about a bad time to try bringing young into the world.

  3. Even if It's children had survived, if any of them did, would this even be of some consequence? Would they inherit the same abilities/power as It? Or would they just be some basic spiders that are perhaps bigger than average, but otherwise the same?

  4. Are the children of It even really independent beings, on that note? Or is it perhaps some other part of It, like how it was able to be all of the leeches that attacked Patrick Hockstetter?

1
  • 1
    As to points 1&2, it may be something in Its actions was necessary for the pregnancy or birth of Its children (draining some kind of energy, needing some sort of simulation for the young)... It may be, as @Broklynite suggests, that it just had nothing better to do, I don't know a reason to believe otherwise, but it's possible It's reasons, well, made sense to It.
    – Megha
    Commented Jan 18, 2016 at 1:22

4 Answers 4

3
  1. IT's an alien creature somehow projecting itself across the galaxy and it has literally nothing better to do than torture and kill children. IT could very well be parthenogenic, and perhaps killing children somehow gets it in the mood.

  2. We have no idea for how long IT was pregnant. Perhaps that species required millennia of gestation.

  3. Remember, IT wasn't an actual spider, IT was projecting itself as a spider to tap into their fears. As a result, IT also took on the weaknesses of the form. Since the original alien is the one actually pregnant, anything IT spawned would presumably have the same powers and children-killing urges.

  4. You're asking on the state of independence of unborn creatures in a fiction book. There is absolutely no way to know unless someone asks King directly and gets a response. However, there is absolutely no evidence that IT would be able to control its spawn, given that we never hear about IT being controlled in turn by IT's mother.

2
  • Fair points, but I've just always mused these things because I think to myself "What if Ben Hanscom HAD missed one of the offspring and it survived?"
    – Alberd
    Commented Jan 18, 2016 at 4:21
  • Unfortunately my answer is really conjecture- what you're really looking for is a Word of God answer and I am afraid I just don't have one
    – Broklynite
    Commented Jan 18, 2016 at 10:30
1

so... It was created before the beginning of the universe (in the macroverse), along with the Turtle who would vomit out our universe. It would travel from planet to planet, feeding on the fear of lifeforms/on those lifeforms until it landed on Earth. However, It remains trapped frozen underground due to the ice age until the 1700s. Then it surfaces and because it's extra hungry from its unusually long nap, kills all the first settlers of the town... then begins feasting every 27 years - with children being It's preference, as their imaginations could produce an unlimited amount of fear (compared to any other species It had encountered), often using the form of a Clown to lure them close - and after feeding had to sleep until it's next cycle.

We don't know how many planets It had been to before Earth and how many times It fed but we do know that human children satiated it much more than any other lifeforms. Assumingly, it required a certain amount of food or energy before it could become pregnant or give birth and never reached that amount until coming to Earth where it could feed considerably more than it ever had before. That's why it hadn't become pregnant or given birth before arriving to Earth (though we don't know it hasn't done this before and there's not lots of Its running around the universe) and likely a coincidence that it's pregnant now as opposed to the 1700's - it just took this long for It to have eaten enough food to support giving birth.

Interesting fact, some female species on Earth can reproduce without males e.g. certain sharks and lizards through unfertilized eggs (parthenogenesis)

1
  • This is a good theory on why it would have waited for its asexual reproduction but apart from inferring from it not having happened before do you have any evidence? Is there any textual/visual evidence that It was waiting to be full enough to become pregnant? If you do have any you can edit that detail into your answer to back it up.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    Commented Aug 3, 2020 at 9:11
0

It is something very long lived, though It's no more Eternal than the Turtle we do know that It doesn't need to eat, having lived without food for most of It's existence, but eating does bring It pleasure. So what is pleasure for? A creature without weaknesses, or in a form without weakness doesn't need fear or anger or hate, but how does it use hunger or pleasure if food doesn't provide it anything?

If the loser's club was given power to kill It in order to prevent it from spawning then It had probably only begun spawning recently, Also, It had only begun eating recently, on the scale of It's existence. Perhaps consuming consciousnesses was how It produced additional consciousnesses? Or maybe eating triggers reproduction, like a resource rich environment would trigger a bacterial spore.

No idea if they would be It like or remnants of what It ate or what.

Since It has a gender the book should really be called "Stephen King's She" Shouldn't it?

3
  • Lol... funny point on the gender but I always assumed it was called IT because the losers referred to it as IT
    – Kai Qing
    Commented Jan 17, 2018 at 23:08
  • Double-funny point on gender, because the whole answer is about how alien IT is, but presumes that, because it's "pregnant", it has to be "female", which isn't even true for all earthly life. ;)
    – Dan J
    Commented Jan 18, 2018 at 1:23
  • @DanJ - Such as seahorses
    – Valorum
    Commented Aug 3, 2020 at 9:05
0

It's millions of years old and IT is a demon entity beyond our human reasoning. I always assumed it reproduced asexually and that the gestation period was thousands and thousands of years. I also assumed that the unfortunate timing for IT and It's run-in with the Loser's Club was predestined. The Turtle decided enough was enough.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.