I am trying to track down a story where the protagonist was waiting for a black hole to collapse to observe the universe that would be created inside. The protagonist had created black holes, but the contents of the universes within were boring. The theory was that our universe was part of a chain of universes whose physical properties were such that black holes that created "good" universes could form.

edit: the story was written by a woman and the protagonist was a woman. It was a short story

  • Was this a short story? A novel? When and where did you read it? Do you remember anything about cover art if you read it in a book? – FuzzyBoots Sep 17 '15 at 15:02
  • 3
    Sounds like it was based on the cosmological natural selection hypothesis from physicist Lee Smolin, which he proposed in 1992, so the story would probably be from that date or later. – Hypnosifl Sep 17 '15 at 16:04
  • 1
    Reading Smolin's "The Life of The Cosmos" book couldn't help but bring back memories of Jeppson's whimsical "The Second Experiment" for me. I forget most of the plot details of that (it maybe involved more a "big bounce" cosmology), but there was some universe hopping, black-hole wrangling ancient race in that, who IIRC find this universe is not to their taste and want to hasten collapse to access the next one. – timday Sep 20 '15 at 20:04
  • This was a short stories. The protagonist was a woman and the story was written by a woman. – lkreinitz Feb 26 at 18:19
  • Except for the "written by a woman" part, I don't see how the current answer doesn't match. It's exactly the story I immediately thought of, and I don't know any other short stories that match on as many details. – DavidW Feb 27 at 4:23

I will hazard a guess that this is the short story "What Continues, What Fails" by David Brin (1991). It's not a perfect match -- the female protagonist is part of a research team that is observing collisions of micro-black holes with a bigger one in order to observe things inside the bigger one, vs. waiting for one to collapse -- but the theme of universes spawning black holes which yield similar universes is a major focus.

A quote, describing how it is possible to see inside of black holes:

Tides tugged at the camera, suspended between, and at the fibre-thin cable leading from the camera to her recorders. Peering into one of those pits of blackness, the mini-telescope saw nothing. That was only natural.

Nothing could escape from inside a black hole.

A special kind of nothing, though. Nothing that had formerly been light, before being stretched down to true nothingness in the act of climbing that steep slope.

The two funnels merged closer still. The microscopic black balls drew nearer.

Light trying to escape a black hole is reddened to nonexistence. Nevertheless, virtual light can theoretically escape one nought, only to be sucked into the other. There it starts blue-shifting exponentially, as gravity yanks it down again. Between one event horizon and the other, the light doesn't "officially" exist. Not in the limiting case. Yet ideally, there should be a flow.

They had not believed her on Kalimarn. Until one day she showed them it was possible, for the narrowest of instants, to tap the virtual stream. To squeeze between the red-shifted and blue-shifted segments. To catch the briefest glimpse --

And another, describing the creation of a "boring" universe in the lab:

Instants after the nought's formation, inflation had turned it into a macrocosm. A fiery ball of plasma exploding in its own context, ina reference frame whose dimensions were all perpendicular to those Isola knew. Within that frame, a wheel of time marked out events, just as it did in Isola's universe -- only vastly speeded up from her point of view.

Energy -- or something like what she'd been taught to call "energy" -- drove the expansion, and traded forms with substances that might vaguely be called "matter." Forces crudely akin to electromagnetism and gravity contested over nascent particles that in coarse ways resembled quarks and leptons. Larger concatenations tried awkwardly to form.

But there was no rhythm, no symmetry. The untuned orchestra could not decide what score to play. There was no melody.

In the speeded-up reference frame of the construct-cosmos, her sampling probe had caught evolution of a coarse kind. Like a pseudo-life fabrication too long out of the vat, the universe Isola had set out to create lurched toward dissipation. The snapshot showed no heavy elements, no stars, no possibility of self-awareness. How could there be? All the rules were wrong.

And one more, describing the "chain of universes" idea:

As DNA coded for success in life-forms, so did rules of nature -- fields and potentials, the finely balanced constants -- carry through from generation to generation of universes, changing subtly, varying to some degree, but above all programmed to prosper.

Black holes are eggs. That was the facile metaphor. Just as eggs carry forward little more than chromosomes, yet bring about effective chickens, all a singularity has to carry through is rules. All that follows is but consequence.

The implications were satisfying.

There is no mystery where we come from. Those cosmos whose traits lead to forming stars of the right kind -- stars which go supernova, then collapse into great noughts -- those are the cosmos which have "young." Young that carry on those traits, or else have no offspring of their own.

  • Does anything in that story match the element "The protagonist had created black holes, but the contents of the universes within were boring"? – Hypnosifl Sep 17 '15 at 18:11
  • 1
    @Hypnosifl - see new edit. – Otis Sep 17 '15 at 20:15
  • 2
    Thanks. BTW, I also found this post by Brin from the Polymath email list confirming that he was inspired by Smolin's hypothesis about cosmological natural selection (which was apparently discussed somewhere in 1990, 2 years before Smolin published it), as I speculated in my other comment. – Hypnosifl Sep 17 '15 at 20:28
  • Forgot I asked this. Sorry not the answer. I have more information I will add to the original post or as comment – lkreinitz Feb 26 at 18:18
  • You're selling your answer short; other than the "female author" requirement, it's a perfect match AFAICT. Note that the "research team" is only 2 people, Isola (the protagonist) and Mikaela and Mikaela's role in the story is very much secondary. (I reread this last night; love the ideas explored.) – DavidW Feb 27 at 15:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.