14

In the Belgariad (and other works by Eddings within the same universe), is it always necessary to use spoken words to cast magic through the Will and the Word? Or is it possible to utilize it purely by will alone, and perhaps simply thinking the word?

3
  • 1
    It's been a long time since I read the Belgariad, but I seem to recall a duel between Belgarath and Ctuchik where a lot of the magic they're flinging around is nonverbal. That could just be poor memory, though. Commented Apr 21, 2015 at 6:17
  • It's been so long since I've read these, I need to read them again. I never did get past book 5.
    – Jim2B
    Commented Apr 22, 2015 at 3:09
  • Updated my answer since I just noticed you said 'sorcery' in the title, but 'magic' in the body, which are two different things in the belgariad.
    – CBredlow
    Commented Feb 28, 2017 at 21:05

3 Answers 3

13

If we stuck purely to the Belgariad, then not necessarily, as we see times where Belgarath and Polgara do things using only their Will. Moments where a Word was used were often used as dramatic effect (such as Belgarath asking a tree to bloom and ordering the knight to tend to it). Often times it is used when they were in distress, or when being dramatic. Take every example where they change into an animal, they never say "Wolf" or "Change". Even the battle of Chutchik and Belgarath, there are no words, just raw energy and will surging.

Outside the Belgariad, no it's definitely not necessary. During the battle of Vo Mimbre, you see the other sorcerers constantly doing their thing without as much as a peep coming out of them. Another example of no words being used would be the time where Belgarath first meets Beldin. The dwarf translocates several tons of stone to the base of Belgarath's tower without saying a word.

However, your question title and question body ask about two separate things, which I've noticed two years later.

For Sorcery, the word isn't as important, and can be done silently.

For Magic, the opposite is true. Magic in this world being the ability to summon and control demons. This is implemented by the Morindim and the Karands. The words are incantations that are needed to control them and force them into what you imagine them to look like. If the magician botches this up, the demon is freed and bad things happen.

Also, re-read a portion that mentioned Eddings' other works. In The Elenium and The Tamuli magic is really just praying. The people casting are uttering prayers to the various gods(Styric, Troll, Elder) to beseech them for their powers. There's even a few times where the gods can refuse, or joke about refusing. The only exception is when Bhelliom is used, but that's because it's its' own thing.

3
  • I literally just reread the Belgariad and came here to ask a different question. Unfortunately, I dont remember which book it was in, but Belgarath says the Word is not necessary. It is just used to focus the Will. Definitely not Pawn of Prophecy, as Garion had not gained his use of magic yet.
    – user23298
    Commented Apr 6, 2023 at 3:10
  • pushes up nerd glasses ACKSHUALLY, Garion never had magic, he only had sorcery. And Polgara called it "The WILL and the WISH" but yeah it's pretty inconsistent with the rules of it.
    – CBredlow
    Commented Oct 4, 2023 at 17:27
  • If I remember correctly, Belgarath said what they did wasnt sorcery, but he liked how it sounded.
    – user23298
    Commented Oct 4, 2023 at 20:57
5

Yes, a word is necessary to complete any sorcerous effect cast by a user of the Will and the Word. In the Belgariad series, practitioners of sorcery (called The Will and the Word) needed both to gather their will and then speak whatever word they used to trigger the spell effect. The word was less important than the will, however.

From the first book of the Belgariad, page 163, in a conversation between Belgarath the Sorcerer (Mr. Wolf) and Garion:

"The Will and the Word," Wolf said, his long cloak whipping about him in the stiff breeze. "It isn't difficult."

"I don't understand," Garion said.

"You simply will something to happen," the old man said, "and then speak the word. If your will's strong enough, it happens."

"That's all there is to it?" Garion asked, a little disappointed.

"That's all," Wolf said.

"Is the word a magic word?"

Wolf laughed, looking out at the sun glittering sharply on the winter sea. "No," he said. "There aren't any magic words. Some people think so, but they're wrong. Grolims use strange words, but that's not really necessary. Any word will do the job. It's the Will that's important, not the Word. The Word's just a channel for the Will."

"I always thought that sorcery had to be done with long spells and strange signs and things like that," Garion said.

"Those are just the devices of tricksters and charlatans," Wolf said. "They make a fine show and impress and frighten simple people, but spells and incantations have nothing to do with the real thing, It's all in the Will. Focus the Will and speak the Word, and it happens. Sometimes a gesture of sorts helps, but it isn't really necessary. Your Aunt has always seemed to want to gesture when she makes something happen. I've been trying to break her of that habit for hundreds of years now."

7
  • 3
    I disagree, as words aren't used when changing into animals, and when Belgarath meets Beldin the first time, he translocates several tons of stone without so much as a whimper.
    – CBredlow
    Commented Apr 21, 2015 at 23:29
  • I quoted it right out of the book. The words of Belgarath himself. Perhaps the words are subvocalized but he says the word is NECESSARY. You may disagree but you shouldn't downvote the answer right out of a quotation. Commented Apr 21, 2015 at 23:33
  • 1
    The question asks if the Word needs to be spoken, which it really doesn't.
    – CBredlow
    Commented Apr 21, 2015 at 23:35
  • I think this is an instance where a character's word is not reflective of reality. Belgarath could simply be mistaken, or more likely he could be simplifying things for Garion's sake, so that he doesn't attempt something more difficult (nonverbal sorcery) before he's ready. Commented Apr 24, 2015 at 9:54
  • 1
    There is a steady drift during the Belgariad from the quoted definition which holds true in the first 3 books, even if the word is whispered, to the often vocally silent duel between Belgarath and Ctuchik. The word may be internally vocalised but this is not explicit so a training / safety tool it may be. Castle of Wizardry has other instances where Polgara and Garion do not vocalise shield for example or after the attack on Durnik. Books thereafter are more ambiguous so in a majority of books, words are not necessary.
    – Rik-Makor
    Commented Mar 27, 2020 at 20:41
1

By the early part of the fourth book I'd decided to take the term "word" in the older sense of content, or concept. When Belgarath explains that any word will do, he isn't saying just pick a random word and it work just fine, he's saying that any word that seems to fit what you want to do will work, and I take that to indicate that it's the concept in the mind that is key. For example, if you want to make a boulder roll, saying "brick" wouldn't work because bricks don't often roll, whereas saying "marble" would work because marbles roll. Of course Belgarath thinks that the word should have some dignity, as we see when Garion says "Push", but since "push" worked dignity isn't important; plainly what's important is the intent behind the word. Given that, even a sigh or growl should work if it serves to connect with the concept. Thus what the "Word" boils down to is a focus of intent that serves as the interface, so to speak, between the Will and the world. Given that, there would be no reason that the Word has to be vocalized so long as the concept of what is to be accomplished is clear.

2
  • Hi, welcome to SF&F. While this analysis seems to agree with the other answers, it could be improved with some direct quotes showing how the word is not always necessary.
    – DavidW
    Commented Jun 9 at 1:41
  • @DavidW I have no access to copies of the books just now -- if I did I wouldn't mind re-reading! I mentioned things I recall from about three years ago to try to show how the Word relates to the Will on what could be called a philosophical level and give an explanation from that perspective.
    – Traildude
    Commented Jun 12 at 4:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.