In her death bed, Mother Abagail tells the Free Zone Committee that the only way to defeat Randall Flagg is for Stuart, Glen, Ralph and Larry to walk all the way to Las Vegas.

Once they (three of the four men) get there, they don't do anything much of consequence and

Flagg himself ends up detonating the A-bomb and killing everyone in the west.

So the question is, why exactly did the four men have to go there? What did they achieve?

  • Could it be that their purpose was to become martyrs rather than to affect any change in events in Las Vegas? – Jeremy French Feb 5 '18 at 11:38

To quote Wikipedia, the chain of events was:

Flagg gathers his entire collective to witness the execution of Brentner and Underwood. Moments before they are to be killed, the Trashcan Man arrives with a stolen nuclear warhead. Flagg conjures a magical ball of energy in an attempt to silence a dissenter, but it is transformed into a giant glowing hand—"The Hand of God"—which detonates the bomb, destroying Las Vegas and killing all of Flagg's followers...

So by going there, the men achieved:

  1. Getting Flagg's followers all gathered together,
  2. Getting Flagg to spin out a lightning ball,
  3. Just as Trashcan Man brings out the nuke

If all the followers weren't there, some would probably have survived. If Flagg hadn't been angrily executing somebody with a ball of energy, there'd have been no trigger for the nuke. These are two things that the men who walked to Las Vegas contributed.

Granted, the nuke showing up at just the right moment, and Flagg's weapon getting redirected by divine intervention, are outside the effects of the two men, but - if you assume some divine inspiration to Mother Abigail's direction - not unconnected.

The particular men who went were the remaining men from the Free Zone committee. In that role, they had already shown their willingness to sacrifice for the community. So - again, assuming divine inspiration - their trek to Las Vegas takes on the role of (self-)sacrifice, in the traditional sense. To the question in the comments "Were these men special or could anyone have gone?" I would answer that their willingness to sacrifice themselves to likely torture and death is what made them special; others could have done it, but also would have been more likely to falter and fail.

I've always thought Stu Redman going had an Abraham/Isaac overtone to it, where his willingness to sacrifice his newfound happiness was required before he could be spared.

  • Fair enough. But then again, did it have to be these particular men or would anyone from the Free Zone do? – sudhanva Feb 5 '18 at 14:33
  • @sudhanva they were chosen because they were the remaining men of the committee. As such, their willingness to sacrifice for the community was probably the defining characteristic. I've always thought Stu Redman had sort of an Abraham/Isaac thing going, where his willingness to sacrifice his newfound happiness was required before he could be spared. The question is not "would anyone from the Free Zone do?" but "would others from the Free Zone carry though, knowing they were likely walking into torture and death?" Possibly, but not guaranteed. – gowenfawr Feb 5 '18 at 14:40
  • Great explanation. You should consider adding the sacrifice bit to your answer. +1 and accepted :) – sudhanva Feb 5 '18 at 14:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.