5

After the events of Chamber of Secrets, it was clear to Dumbledore that Lucius Malfoy was behind opening the Chamber of Secrets (Dumbledore believed Harry & it seemed all the time that he kept an eye on Harry too). In subsequent years, he also discovered that Tom Riddle's diary was one of Voldemort's Horcruxes.

Why didn't Dumbledore suspect that Lucius Malfoy was a Death Eater? We didn't see him confront Lucius or at least, raise his voice against Lucius in the Ministry.

  • Who says he didn't? Was Lucius on trial? – user35971 Dec 22 '14 at 14:20
6

He knew Lucius supported the Dark Lord but couldn’t prove it.

When Dumbledore confronts him about giving Ginny the diary, he knows and admits to Lucius that he can’t actually prove that Lucius was responsible for anything that had happened.

“Because you gave it to her,’ said Harry. ‘In Flourish and Blotts. You picked up her old Transfiguration book, and slipped the diary inside it, didn’t you?’

He saw Mr Malfoy’s white hands clench and unclench. ‘Prove it,’ he hissed.

‘Oh, no one will be able to do that,’ said Dumbledore, smiling at Harry. ‘Not now Riddle has vanished from the book. On the other hand, I would advise you, Lucius, not to go giving out any more of Lord Voldemort’s old school things. If any more of them find their way into innocent hands, I think Arthur Weasley, for one, will make sure they are traced back to you …”
- Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Chapter 18 (Dobby’s Reward)

The opening of the Chamber would have been the only thing Dumbledore could try to use against Lucius. Nothing from when the Dark Lord was in power the first time would have counted. After the Dark Lord disappeared, Lucius went to the Ministry and told them he was bewitched, acting under the Imperius Curse. Whatever he did during that time, he’d already gotten himself acquitted for it.

“I’ve heard of his family,’ said Ron darkly. ‘They were some of the first to come back to our side after You-Know-Who disappeared. Said they’d been bewitched. My dad doesn’t believe it. He says Malfoy’s father didn’t need an excuse to go over to the Dark Side.”
- Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 7 (The Sorting Hat)

Arthur Weasley suspected that Lucius did actually support the Dark Lord, and it’s very likely Dumbledore did too. From his notes in “The Tales of Beedle the Bard”, Dumbledore may have suspected Lucius was a Death Eater even before the Chamber was opened. He says, about Lucius’s campaign to get “The Fountain of Fair Fortune” removed from the Hogwarts Library, that the discussion they had over it marked the beginning of Lucius trying to get Dumbledore removed as headmaster and Dumbledore trying to make Lucius not the Dark Lord’s favorite Death Eater.

“This exchange marked the beginning of Mr. Malfoy’s long campaign to have me removed from my post as headmaster of Hogwarts, and of mine to have him removed from his position as Lord Voldemort’s Favorite Death Eater.”
- The Tales of Beedle the Bard

During Harry’s second year, Lucius was very clearly trying to have Dumbledore removed as headmaster - so their mutual campaigns against each other had likely begun before then.

11

He had no reason to suspect Lucius Malfoy of being a Death Eater, since he knew that he was one (especially after the end of Goblet of Fire). However, there's a big difference between knowing something and being able to prove it.

During the events of Order of the Phoenix, the Ministry was doing their best to deny Voldemort's return, discredit Harry and, due to his support of Harry, Dumbledore as well. That's a year at least in which his claims wouldn't even be considered by most at the Ministry, especially those in a position to do anything about it.

Tom Riddle's diary was a Horcrux, but after the end of Chamber of Secrets I don't know if there was any way to prove that. Assuming that there isn't, it's just a diary with no proven connection to Lucius Malfoy. Ginny and Harry's testimony wouldn't have been worth much, if anything; memories don't appear to be considered evidence (since they can be tampered with).

Lucius was a rich, powerful, influential and well respected wizard from a prominent family, without concrete evidence - of which there wasn't any - accusing him would have done no real good.

And, if Dumbledore had brought up the Horcrux, he would have done the one thing he absolutely didn't want to do: told Voldemort that he knew about them.

  • 1
    Also being a Death Eater wasn't per se a crime was it? Dumbledore (and Harry) tried to persuade people that Voldemort was going to return but in general most of the Wizarding World seemed set on ignoring the possibility of that happening. – Dan Kelly Jan 28 '13 at 10:01
  • 2
    I'm not sure if being a Death Eater was a crime in and of itself - all of the DE trial scenes described in the book focus on the other crimes they committed while serving Voldemort. Though if I recall correctly Lucius had claimed to have been forced into serving Voldemort before he failed to kill Harry; proving that he was still an active Death Eater may have resulted in him going on trial again for those crimes. – Anthony Grist Jan 28 '13 at 10:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.