4

In the Star Trek: Short Treks episode "Calypso", how could the USS Discovery possibly stay operational for a 1000 years? Maintenance-wise, energy-wise.

  • 3
    No planned obsolescence in a post-capitalism world? – Klaus Æ. Mogensen Nov 13 '18 at 9:24
  • 1
    I think we'll have to wait and see. Upcoming episodes of Discovery may cover this, and it's unfortunately impossible to predict how science will work in the Trek universe (eg, spores and tardigrades). I think this question is interesting from a real-world perspective, but I suspect that the in-show explanation will rely on technobabble that will be revealed in future works. – Gaultheria Nov 15 '18 at 8:06
1

Maintenance

Maintenance of the Discovery is performed, one assumes, by the apparently fully sentient ship itself. Since it's basically in mothballs hanging in space, it certainly isn't beyond the realms of reality to assume that it's simply replicating the relatively small number of parts that it needs from raw materials as and when it needs them and then just transporting them into place using high-precision transport. It may also be constructing advanced radio-controlled robotic avatars when physical intervention is required.

Feedstock + Raw Materials.

The ship's tractor beams are working fine, as are scanners. Any passing raw materials (space rocks and ejecta) that look interesting can be snagged and moved into the shuttle bay for examination and to form part of the ship's supplies.

Energy requirements

Without a crew and with other systems on low-power mode, the ship's energy reserves would be considerable. The ship itself appears to be parked in some kind of lightning storm in space. The energy from any strikes or nearby clouds may be being channelled into the ship's power network. We also know that the ship has limited warp capability which suggests that a low-level matter/anti-matter reaction is still taking place in the warp core.

  • (pinging you here not to clog the new question with unrelated comments, we'll clean that up later) I know of the meta and I link to it from time to time but for whatever reason I noticed more replies/reactions to the "squeezed" version than when I linked to the meta (or did both). 'course the figures may vary, but habit sticked... – Jenayah Nov 29 '18 at 0:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.