In Star Wars, hyperspace is the main way of travel. It's used by the Rebel Alliance both as a way to attack and to escape.

Quite understandably, the Empire created Interdictor-class Star Destroyers. Those starships where made with the sole purpose of preventing other starships to go into hyperspace.

But even though those ships exist, they barely saw any use at all, especially in battles where their presence would have changed the outcome of the war.

The most damning example that come to mind would be the Battle of Scarif. At that point, the Empire knew that a fatal weakness existed in the Death Star. So when the Rebels attacked Scarif, where the Death Star's plan was stored, it was pretty obvious what they were aiming for. So the Empire sent a massive amount of reinforcements, which lead to the rebels getting decimated. But a Corvette still manage to escape and enter hyperspace.

All the Empire needed was one Interdictor, and the rebels would have never had a chance to win, because the plans would have never left Scarif.

Obviously, the easy answer would be that there wasn't any Interdictor available close enough to the battle to make it in time. Which would raise another question, why was such a vital ship, that can completely corner an enemy and cut off their only escape route, not a mandatory part of any and all fleets?

Why were the Interdictor-class ships, which provided an incredible tactical advantage, almost never used?

  • 2
    I don't have the references available to provide evidence for a complete answer, but Interdictor-class SD have relatively weak armament, less than 1/3 of an Imperial-class. That means they're not terribly useful on their own, only in a task force with other heavy ships. Even the Empire isn't going to build thousands of these, just what they expect to need, and they'll be deployed where they're useful - which is presumably out capturing smugglers, etc. Plus, before Scarif, is the Empire even aware that the Rebels can field a force like this?
    – DavidW
    Jul 13, 2020 at 13:00
  • Related question.
    – Null
    Jul 13, 2020 at 13:03
  • 1
    @DavidW yeah but the empire has been shown time and again to not be shy from wasting resources. When Scarif happened, the empire had already been victim to many guerilla style attacks from the rebels. So they knew their M.O, the battle of Scarif was considered enough of a Crisis to even send the death star there to destroy the Archives, so adding one or two interceptors to the reinforcements does not seems to be a stretch
    – user3399
    Jul 13, 2020 at 13:06
  • To be fair, one Interdictor-class ship wouldn't be sufficient. Send two ships in opposite directions; the SD can only follow one, so the other should be able to pull clear for a jump. (I also don't know my Star Wars physics very well, but didn't an Interdictor work by using gravity well generators? What gravity well is the destroyer creating that isn't dwarfed by Scarif's well?)
    – chepner
    Jul 13, 2020 at 13:34
  • In the pre-Disney EU, they did see common use, but like the others said, they required escort ships to provide a successful blockade
    – The Fallen
    Jul 14, 2020 at 13:43

2 Answers 2


In canon, nearly every appearance of the Imperial Interdictor is followed by some kind of failure.

  • In Tarkin, set in 14 BBY, a prototype Interdictor is used in an attempt to stop rebels from fleeing with Grand Moff Tarkin's personal corvette, but instead pulls a small fleet out of hyperspace. It is sent back to the Corellian Engineering Corporation due to its many operational issues.
  • In the Star Wars Rebels episode "Stealth Strike," set in 4 BBY, one commanded by Brom Titus manages to pull a CR90 Corvette out of hyperspace, but is later destroyed due to two people infiltrating it in stormtrooper disguises.
  • In a later Star Wars Rebels episode, "Zero Hour," set in 3 BBY, two are used in the Battle of Atollon to prevent the rebel fleet from escaping. One is destroyed via Commander Jun Sato's ramming maneuver, and another is incapacitated when Ezra Bridger and Clan Wren destroyed its gravity well projectors.
  • By 0 BBY, when the novel Heir to the Jedi is set, the Immobilizer 418 cruiser was discontinued by the Empire due to its vulnerabilities.

This track record is evidence enough to show why the Interdictor didn't see much us. It was easily destroyed and inconsistent in its ability.

  • I don't have the source to hand, but I recall a "take-that" in Zahn's (now-Legends) Thrawn novels to the effect that Thrawn could use them effectively, but when they worked at all for lesser commanders it was mostly down to luck.
    – DavidW
    Oct 26, 2020 at 20:14

I'd just simply say costs its probably much easier & cheaper to build several regular or older versions then the near especially if it's not fully tested or has a flaw that hasn't been worked out. Take the real life example during World War II it was easier to build destroyers & later liberty ships on the quick then to build the normal troop transports & the big bad battleships for protecting fleets. Why do you think there are no battleships made today but we still make destroyers and most other ships to protect fleets & aircraft carriers or transport supplies & troops.

As DavidW felt I needed to give a bit more evidence to my opinion or observation I had to edit & add to my point. In the series Rebel towards the end Tarkin calls Thrawn back to defend the Thrawns new tie fighter project against that of the Star Destroyer stardust project. It also is mentioned in the movie Rogue where the funding & delays in the stardust/ death star project have made the emperor & Tarkin question continuing the project. One of the points mentioned is cost & delays to the construction of the deathstar & why Rogue's father is forced back into the project which leads to him building in the flaw that is later exploited. Even in real life there are people who feel that there really is no need to worry about cost for projects & yet there is always a point were costs come into play. There are other points in the Star wars universal not just limited to movies or shows but even in print or online media where it seems there is endless money time & resources to the empire & yet where even the emperor wonders about costs & wonders if something else might be better.

There are times where being able to mass produce something cheater even with limited purpose can be better then having an endless budget & producing only a few high tech type stuff. Many say one of the key points to Allies winning WW2 was the liberty ship which could be maded easily & quickly at one point several per day & using them to ship troops & supplies to Britain helping keep them in the fight. We were able to produce liberty ships faster then they could be sunk by u-boats. Thrawns tie defender fighter is being created on Ezra's planet & is shut down by Kanaan's sacrifice & this leads to Thrawn having to try to keep the project alive by talking to the emperor so Thrawn can get the funding to rebuild & start the factories back up unfortunately for thrawn the emporer ends up giving the rebels the victory & see's it as not worth it so the money goes to the deathstar. I forget which movie it was but again this comes up again after I think the first deathstar is destroyed & the emperor says that for the time & cost of one deathstar he could have had a million tie defenders & wiped out the rebels. I can only go by what i've seen & read in my limited travels through the star wars universe as to answer your question. In my last point you could build two or three destroyers for the same price in time resources & funding as you could build the bigger stronger better equipped better armored battleships.

As such that is why many these days including the US no longer make Battleships & instead make more faster frigates & destroyers to serve the purpose battleships use to do which was protect the fleet & in particular the flag ships & aircraft carriers. Sorry I just remember another point where in several movies & in the series Rebels the Rebels admit that Thrawns Tie Defender has no flaws & can't be matched by anything the rebels have let alone know about which leads to them trying to take out the factor which Kanaan helps make sure happens. This suggest that if the empire had restarted the tie defender instead of building the deathstars &/or focused on building more indictor destroyers the empire might have ended the rebels without much hassle but by focusing on other things or maybe to many projects they don't see the flaws until it's too late.

Again maybe they would have found the secret weakness in the deathstar or whatever & having a million ships faster stronger & better armed fighters then your enemy may be enough to keep them at bay, let alone be able to destroy them if they end up daring to take you on. There are always lots of "cost factors" in projects. I'll shut up now.

  • There are a few points that need some improvement to make this a good answer. If the reason so few Interdictors were built/used is cost, you need to provide evidence of that. (They would have been very useful against the Rebels in a lot of scenarios.) Also, your point about battleships isn't really on-point, since cost isn't the reason for their obsolescence, and it's not a great analogy anyway.
    – DavidW
    Nov 2, 2021 at 18:53
  • 1
    Welcome to SciFi.SE! At the moment, this answer is a giant, unreadable wall of text. Would you be able to break it up into paragraphs to make it easier to read? Also, please try and be wary of spoilers; I think I spy a Star Wars: Rebels spoiler in there somewhere, and I haven't seen Rebels yet.
    – F1Krazy
    Nov 2, 2021 at 21:05
  • Note that it's perfectly okay to include spoilers in your answer, you should just prefix them with ">! " so that people can choose whether or not they want to see them.
    – DavidW
    Nov 2, 2021 at 21:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.